1940
DOI: 10.2307/2084039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acculturation and Personality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1943
1943
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acculturation has its roots in anthropology and sociological research, and has been revisited and re-formulated at regular intervals (Schwartz et al 2010). Early definitions incorporated the ideas of acculturation as a process that involves cultural contact between societies (Gillin and Raimy 1940). Since these initial definitions, acculturation has been conceptualized as both an individual and group process and approached as uni-dimensional or bi-dimensional (Schwartz et al 2010;Berry 2003).…”
Section: Contemporary Acculturation Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acculturation has its roots in anthropology and sociological research, and has been revisited and re-formulated at regular intervals (Schwartz et al 2010). Early definitions incorporated the ideas of acculturation as a process that involves cultural contact between societies (Gillin and Raimy 1940). Since these initial definitions, acculturation has been conceptualized as both an individual and group process and approached as uni-dimensional or bi-dimensional (Schwartz et al 2010;Berry 2003).…”
Section: Contemporary Acculturation Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acculturation may also transpire when social, economic, and political inequities exist (or are perceived to exist) between groups of people (Redfield et al 1936). Since cultures do not exist without human interaction, acculturation is the process of change as experienced by individuals (Gillin & Raimy 1940).…”
Section: Why Acculturation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interviews had been recorded in small notebooks in which each item could be conveniently entered on a separate page or pages. 6 Each interview was in a separate notebook, which was labeled on the outside with a fictitious name. In making the judgments, the investigator considered at a time only a single item in the interview.…”
Section: Institute Of Human Relations Yale Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%