2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2010.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accruals accounting in the public sector: A road not always taken

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
184
0
14

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
184
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the introduction of accruals accounting in Ireland and the UK during the 1990s hit different political logics -in the UK a pragmatic non-ideological approach brought its incorporation but not in Ireland where a few civil servants drove the change with little involvement of politicians but gave departments discretion over developing accruals accounting (Hyndman and Connolly, 2011); introducing output oriented budgeting and control in the Netherlands had to be reconciled with another prevailing logic, namely programme budgeting (Ter Bogt and Van Helden, 2011); performance-based appraisal and rewards implemented in three Italian Ministries became ambiguous and thus translated and operationalised differently which resulted in differing results, uncertain meanings, unclear intentions and conflicting goals (Arnaboldi and Palermo, 2011). The nature of government may make a difference, e.g.…”
Section: Reconstituting the Public Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the introduction of accruals accounting in Ireland and the UK during the 1990s hit different political logics -in the UK a pragmatic non-ideological approach brought its incorporation but not in Ireland where a few civil servants drove the change with little involvement of politicians but gave departments discretion over developing accruals accounting (Hyndman and Connolly, 2011); introducing output oriented budgeting and control in the Netherlands had to be reconciled with another prevailing logic, namely programme budgeting (Ter Bogt and Van Helden, 2011); performance-based appraisal and rewards implemented in three Italian Ministries became ambiguous and thus translated and operationalised differently which resulted in differing results, uncertain meanings, unclear intentions and conflicting goals (Arnaboldi and Palermo, 2011). The nature of government may make a difference, e.g.…”
Section: Reconstituting the Public Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estas mudanças incluem muitas vezes um movimento a partir de uma base de caixa para um sistema de contabilidade com base em acréscimos na crença de que esta vontade fornecer informações mais adequadas para os tomadores de decisão e levar a uma melhor tomada de decisão (Hyndman & Connoly, 2011) iii . Na primeira metade da década de 1980, o Brasil possuía uma situação que se configurava era de elevada desorganização, com as principais instituições de finanças públicas completamente despreparadas sob a ótica dos instrumentos de que dispunham para planejamento, execução e controle de suas atividades e da contabilidade como instrumento de apoio às estatísticas fiscais do país (Feijó, 2009).…”
Section: Uma História Da Contabilidade Pública No Brasilunclassified
“…Austria, Czech Republic and Lithuania are moving toward implementation. But from the available data in 2011, it is evident that Ireland (Connolly and Hyndman, 2011), France, Germany, Romania, Sweden, Portugal, Spain, Greece, Italy and Cyprus have also made considerable efforts to introduce the accrual accounting basis at the national level (FEE, 2011). It is also necessary to mention Australia and Canada, which are considered to be the most developed countries in the usage of the accrual accounting basis not only for financial reporting but also for budgeting purposes at all levels of government (Mehrolhassani and Emami, 2013 have introduced the DRG methodology at the sectoral level for paying public health services provided by public hospitals (Polyzos et al, 2013;Christensen, Laegreid and Stigen, 2004;Pettersen, 2001;Helmig and Lapsley, 2001;SanchezMartinez et al, 2006).…”
Section: Ivana Dražić Lutilsky Berislav žMuk and Martina Dragijamentioning
confidence: 99%