2012
DOI: 10.1108/09513571211198782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting's past, present and future: the unifying power of history

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to revisit the special issue of Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal published in 1996 on the theme “Accounting history into the twenty‐first century”, in order to identify and assess the impact of the special issue in shaping developments in the accounting history literature, and to consider issues for future historical research in accounting.Design/methodology/approachA retrospective and prospective essay focusing on developments in the historical accounting liter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
148
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 216 publications
(262 reference statements)
4
148
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet how should the impact of these SIs be evaluated -is it merely by 'encouragement'? ii The five reviews of AAAJ SIs between 1990 and 1997 (Burritt, 2012;Carnegie & Napier, 2012;Gray & Laughlin, 2012;Humphrey & Miller, 2012;Lehman, 2012) reflect different ways of assessing the impact of SIs written more than 15 years previously. Indeed, Humphrey and Miller (2012) (writing on public management reforms) are concerned about approaches to measurement and reporting of impact, especially as exhortations and questions raised by a SI can generate unexpected results, the wider impact of academic writing on practice as well as research, and the diverse measures available for measurement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet how should the impact of these SIs be evaluated -is it merely by 'encouragement'? ii The five reviews of AAAJ SIs between 1990 and 1997 (Burritt, 2012;Carnegie & Napier, 2012;Gray & Laughlin, 2012;Humphrey & Miller, 2012;Lehman, 2012) reflect different ways of assessing the impact of SIs written more than 15 years previously. Indeed, Humphrey and Miller (2012) (writing on public management reforms) are concerned about approaches to measurement and reporting of impact, especially as exhortations and questions raised by a SI can generate unexpected results, the wider impact of academic writing on practice as well as research, and the diverse measures available for measurement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accounting, Roslender and Dillard (2003) have pointed out that interdisciplinarity has come to represent "the other", that is all other disciplines outside economics: history, philosophy, political science, social psychology, sociology, organisational behaviour, and more. The major concern for interdisciplinary researchers has often been accounting and accountability in action, with related human characteristics and values intrinsically embedded in their sociocultural, psychological and institutional contexts: past, present and future (Brewer, 1999;Merchant, 2008;Carnegie and Napier, 2012).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Offeringsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It finds out how an event or accounting practices at a particular time has meaning for individuals, organizations and society. Carnegie and Napier (2012) revealed that history provides information and an appreciation to contemporary accounting thought and practice by bringing together the strengths of past, present and future. Accounting existence can be seen from human activities undertaken and history framework provides an evaluation the effect of accounting for individuals, organizations and communities, not only the past but today and prospects for future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%