2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:rihe.0000010045.13366.a6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for Model Uncertainty in the Prediction of University Graduation Rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a related paper, Goenner and Snaith (2004) used Bayesian averaging methods to estimate a graduation rate model. They argued that using different model specifications can lead to contrary findings given the uncertainty about the true set of covariates that explain the phenomena of interest.…”
Section: Existing Research On Institutional Graduation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a related paper, Goenner and Snaith (2004) used Bayesian averaging methods to estimate a graduation rate model. They argued that using different model specifications can lead to contrary findings given the uncertainty about the true set of covariates that explain the phenomena of interest.…”
Section: Existing Research On Institutional Graduation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, previous research has shown that college size is related negatively to their graduation rate (see Astin et al, 1996;Mortenson, 1997;Terenzini, 1991, 2005;Porter, 2000). Minority students also graduate at lower rates than white students, and women graduate at higher rates, so we included aggregated institutional-level proportions of these demographic characteristics (Goenner and Snaith, 2004;Scott et al, 2006).…”
Section: Dataset and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raftery et al (1997) demonstrate using simulated data, where the true model is known, that BMA is better able to discern the true model specification than stepwise methods in the presence of uncertainty. Goenner and Snaith (2004) have also shown with respect to the analysis of graduation rates that this method provides a neutral way of dealing with variable selection and improves out of sample predictions relative to results based on a single model specification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although within the same theoretical framework, the variables employed can be operationalized in different ways, which makes the measurements used in the diverse studies vary from one study to another. Consequently, the results of the investigations may be different, both with regard to the effects considered as predictors and with regard to their meaning (Goenner & Snaith, 2004). Some of the studies are limited to specific settings, whose conditions are not generalizable (Nonis & Wright, 2003).…”
Section: Palabras Clave: Regresión Logística Versus Regresión Linealmentioning
confidence: 99%