Accounting for Innovation and Measuring Innovativeness: An Illustrative Framework and an Application

Mairesse, Jacques; Mohnen, Pierre

doi:10.1257/000282802320189302

Cited by 302 publications

(178 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

171

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Survey questions asked whether the firm had introduced significantly improved services in the previous three years and whether it had introduced completely new services during the same time period (new to the firm itself, not necessarily to the market). These questions parallel those used in European Community Innovation Surveys, designed by the Eurostat and found to contain relevant information in a voluminous stream of research (see e.g., Mairesse & Mohnen, 2002;Veugelers & Cassiman, 1999). About half of the firms surveyed here had launched new or improved services, more firms making improvements than launching new services, as one would expect.…”

Section: The Business Service Datasetmentioning

confidence: 97%

Control of intellectual assets in client relationships: implications for innovation

Leiponen

2008

Strategic Management Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYThis empirical study of business-to-business service firms examines the determinants and effects of control rights to intellectual assets in a property rights theoretic framework. Regression analyses using survey data suggest that service suppliers who retain control over their intellectual output are more innovative. In long-term relationships, service firms' clients may thus be better off balancing their need to control outsourced activities with the suppliers' incentives to invest in learning and innovation. Additionally, and aligned with property rights theoretic predictions, service suppliers' bargaining power and their indispensability in service projects are positively associated with their ability to retain control rights. In contrast, innovation capabilities are not very significant in determining control rights allocation between service suppliers and their clients.

show abstract

Section: The Business Service Datasetmentioning

confidence: 97%

Control of intellectual assets in client relationships: implications for innovation

Leiponen

2008

Strategic Management Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…An analysis of the decision-making process in this area could be helpful to businesses in developing a strategic innovation management process. Mairesse and Mohnen (2002) indicate for seven European countries that there is not a one-to-one correspondence between the innovativeness of a country and the observed innovation intensity, in other words, between what is possible and what happens in reality. Some countries do much better than predicted (NL and Ireland), others do not do as well (Belgium).…”

Section: Innovationmentioning

confidence: 87%

Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Culture, A Matter of Interaction between Technology, Progress and Economic Growth? An Introduction

Ulijn¹,

Brown²

2004

Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Culture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…number of patents, number of trademarks, share of sales in innovative products, etc. (Mairesse, Mohnen 2002).…”

Section: Literature Review and The Research Questionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficiency of National Innovation Systems – Poland and Bulgaria in The Context of the Global Innovation Index

Jankowska

Matysek-Jędrych

Mroczek-Dąbrowska

2017

CER

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this paper is to explain how national innovation systems may transform innovation input into innovation output in different counties. Using the Global Innovation Index (GII) we discuss what can be understood by the term ‘innovation’ and how it is translated into the national level. The research question is founded on the assumption that the higher the innovation input, the higher the innovation output attained by a country. We use cluster analysis to verify our assumption, referring to a total of 228 countries. Afterwards we conduct a more in‑depth analysis of two cases (Poland and Bulgaria), where the research question does not find confirmation. Using the cross‑comparison method we aim to verify how and why national innovation systems failed (or succeeded) in creating innovations.

show abstract

Accounting for Innovation and Measuring Innovativeness: An Illustrative Framework and an Application

Cited by 302 publications

References 2 publications

Control of intellectual assets in client relationships: implications for innovation

Control of intellectual assets in client relationships: implications for innovation

Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Culture, A Matter of Interaction between Technology, Progress and Economic Growth? An Introduction

Efficiency of National Innovation Systems – Poland and Bulgaria in The Context of the Global Innovation Index

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About