1995
DOI: 10.2307/1495057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accountability in a Broader Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, social, economic, technological, and cultural changes generally create adverse effects on the education system, particularly on schools, and cause undesired results aside from low academic performance to ensue. Considering the criticism of schools around the world, one observes that they offer the public few benefits and are unable to show the performance expected of them despite the huge amount of investment provided; they are expected to behave more responsibly and to be held accountable for greater performance and efficiency (Kuchapski, 2001;Nagy, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, social, economic, technological, and cultural changes generally create adverse effects on the education system, particularly on schools, and cause undesired results aside from low academic performance to ensue. Considering the criticism of schools around the world, one observes that they offer the public few benefits and are unable to show the performance expected of them despite the huge amount of investment provided; they are expected to behave more responsibly and to be held accountable for greater performance and efficiency (Kuchapski, 2001;Nagy, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The economic crisis of the 1970s, technological developments, growing knowledge of society and economy, and globalization produced many problems in developed countries both in the fields of public and educational management. In this context, educational and public institutions in this era lost others' trust because they had not been able to keep up with the changing conditions, had not been able to meet public expectations, and had been involved in bribery and corruption (Earl, 1995;Hood, 1991Hood, , 1995Kuchapski, 2001;Nagy, 1995;O'Day, 2002). Because the traditional management philosophy emphasizing terms such as work division, specialization, qualification, hierarchy, rules, input, process control, and productivity had broken down, the new management philosophy of governance was adapted more and more every day to reestablish trust in public institutions for providing greater satisfaction, preventing monopolization, abolishing arbitrary management, ensuring transparency, sustaining private sector cooperation, and holding organizations' accountable to the needs of citizens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%