Accountability and Debt Management: The Case of New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Abstract

New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) provides transportation infrastructure and services to nearly 15 million residents of two states. In 2002, the MTA violated a strong professional norm of debt management by refinancing $13 billion of long-term debt in a way that increased rather than decreased the cost of repayment. This behavior, heavily influenced by the informal advice of investment bankers, seemed to many observers to confirm the oft-decried tendency of debt-issuing public authorities to sacrifice their accountability to citizens in order to please the bankers and other debt-market participants on whom they depend for financial resources. Yet the MTA’s choice appears on closer examination to have fulfilled the common desires of contemporary fare payers, tax payers, voters, and elected officials to maximize current spending while deferring costs to future tax and fare payers. The MTA case highlights potential conflicts between the professional imperative of democratic accountability and the competing professional norms of cost minimization, sustainability, and intergenerational equity. The fundamental structure of this dilemma is also apparent in other policy arenas with intergenerational implications, such as social security and climate policy, and raises the question of when obedience to market, political, and hierarchical expectations can justify sacrificing professional principles.

Recentralization and vertical alignment in the French health‐care system

“…The need to balance private and public interest is critical in policy areas with inherent incommensurability (Hwang, ) or intergenerational implications such as social security (health care and retirement pensions) or environmental sustainability (Boudet, ). Overseas case studies of public services often highlight contradictory interest between professional imperatives such as accountability, reliability, cost minimization, demands from financial markets, including debt repayment for future generations (Justice & Miller, ), and greater public expectations (predictability, affordability, availability, and uniformity). On top of that, add a deterioration in service quality, the alienation of the public employees (Tummers, Bekkers, van Thiel, & Steijn, ), and a loss of purpose within public organizations that were subjected to NPM reforms.…”

Determinants of the Credit Rating Fee in the Municipal Bond Market

“…In representing the issuer's interests, experienced financial advisors may negotiate lower rating fees with CRAs, although this premise has not been previously tested. Justice and Miller () recently detailed the uneasy tension between democratic accountability and the relationship of issuers with financial intermediaries.…”

Administration without Borders

“…Slight changes in these estimates have profound budgetary implications for the states and municipalities that rely on these entities to meet their obligations to retired employees (Walsh 2010). So the decision to rely on hybrid organizations raises myriad novel policy questions, but the successful implementation of such an approach requires an equally profound reevaluation of administrative assumptions (Justice and Miller 2010). Scholars focused on the administrative issues raised by hybrid government can make a valuable contribution to policy debates by highlighting the implementation pitfalls that are often unconsidered in the policy‐making process.…”