2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00128-005-0668-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accidental Discharge of Brodifacoum Baits in a Tidal Marine Environment: A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…32 Furthermore, samples taken nine days after the spill were below the level of detection (0.02 ppm) 33 (Primus et al 2005). 34 35 Based on available evidence, the significance determination for this alternative is expected to be 36 not significant.…”
Section: 421mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…32 Furthermore, samples taken nine days after the spill were below the level of detection (0.02 ppm) 33 (Primus et al 2005). 34 35 Based on available evidence, the significance determination for this alternative is expected to be 36 not significant.…”
Section: 421mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empson and Miskelly (1999) found no change in the density of 2 spotties during observation, and divers did not find any dead or moribund organisms. 3 4 Eighteen tons of brodifacoum bait was accidentally spilled into the ocean at Kaikoura, New 5 Zealand in May 2001 (Primus et al 2005). No fish were found dead and of the five fish sampled 6 only a Japanese butterfish (Psenopsis anomala) tested nine days after the spill had detectable 7 residues, of 0.040 mg/L in the liver and 0.020 mg/l in the gut (Primus et al 2005 likelihood of their exposure to anticoagulants at the levels that caused mortality in the three 32 species listed above is considered negligible.…”
Section: Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The anticoagulants are generally less toxic to fish and invertebrates than they are to mammals and birds, but there may be risks to fish and other organisms if there is considerable run off of bait particles into aquatic environments from treated areas. However, a recent dramatic accident, in which approximately 18 tonnes of brodifacoum bait was deposited into the sea on the coast of New Zealand, has permitted a practical and large-scale assessment of the fate of brodifacoum in the marine environment (Primus et al, 2005). The principal environmental effect observed during intensive monitoring was the appearance of brodifacoum residues in certain filter-feeding molluscs and crustacea.…”
Section: Environmental Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%