Accident-precipitating factors for crashes in turbine-powered general aviation aircraft

Abstract

General aviation (14CFR Part 91) accounts for 83% of civil aviation fatalities. While much research has focused on accident causes/pilot demographics in this aviation sector, studies to identify factors leading up to the crash (accident-precipitating factors) are few. Such information could inform on pre-emptive remedial action. With this in mind and considering the paucity of research on turbine-powered aircraft accidents the study objectives were to identify accident-precipitating factors and determine if the accident rate has changed over time for such aircraft operating under 14CFR Part 91. The NTSB Access database was queried for accidents in airplanes (<12,501lb) powered by 1-2 turbine engines and occurring between 1989 and 2013. We developed and utilized an accident-precipitating factor taxonomy. Statistical analyses employed logistic regression, contingency tables and a generalized linear model with Poisson distribution. The "Checklist/Flight Manual Not Followed" was the most frequent accident-precipitating factor category and carried an excess risk (OR 2.34) for an accident with a fatal and/or serious occupant injury. This elevated risk reflected an over-representation of accidents with fatal and/or serious injury outcomes (p<0.001) in the "non-adherence to V Speeds" sub-category. For accidents grouped in the "Inadequate Pre-Flight Planning/Inspection/Procedure" the "inadequate weather planning" sub-category accounted (p=0.036) for the elevated risk (OR 2.22) of an accident involving fatal and/or serious injuries. The "Violation FARs/AIM Deviation" category was also associated with a greater risk for fatal and/or serious injury (OR 2.59) with "Descent below the MDA/failure to execute the missed approach" representing the largest sub-category. Accidents in multi-engine aircraft are more frequent than their single engine counterparts and the decline (50%) in the turbine aircraft accident rate over the study period was likely due, in part, to a 6-fold increased representation of single engine airplanes. In conclusion, our study is the first to identify novel precursive factors for accidents involving turbine aircraft operating under 14CFR Part 91. This research highlights areas that should receive further emphasis in training/recurrency in a pre-emptive attempt to nullify candidate accident-precipitating factor(s).

Flying Off the Handle: Affective Influences on Decision Making and Action Tendencies in Real-World Aircraft Maintenance Engineering Scenarios

“…In Australia, such factors contribute up to 30% of all reported aviation accidents (Civil Aviation Safety Authority, 2013). This is of particular concern in the general aviation (GA) sector, where regulation has a tendency to be less stringent (Boyd & Stolzer, 2016) and where there is by comparison less oversight by both companies (internal) and regulators (external) than for commercial service providers. Comprising civil aviation operations other than scheduled commercial air transportation (e.g., gliders, corporate jet flights), GA includes business travel, agricultural aviation, flight training, medical transport, aerial map-ping, and aerial law enforcement.…”

Fatal General Aviation Accidents in Furtherance of Business (1996–2015): Rates, Risk Factors, and Accident Causes

“…The database provides pilot parameters such as certification, total time and time-in-type, and injury severity outcome in the final report. Accident causes were categorized (Boyd & Stolzer, 2015) using information from the NTSB final report.…”

A Bayesian-Network-based Approach to Risk Analysis in Runway Excursions

“…Some of the most serious happen during landing. This phase is critical as pilots must consider many factors and make the right decisions quickly (Gerard, 2006; You et al, 2013; Wang et al, 2014; Boyd and Stolzer, 2016). According to Boeing (2016), in the last ten years 49% of accidents in commercial flights occurred during the final approach or landing.…”