2012
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessory mental foramina: prevalence, position and diameter assessed by cone‐beam computed tomography and digital panoramic radiographs

Abstract: The results of this study suggest that CBCT is an effective tool for presurgical tridimensional assessment of the neurovascular structures, such as MF and its variations; On the other hand, PAN examinations were not able to show the AMF cases assessed on CBCT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
52
4
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
52
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Three AMF on the left side and three on the right side, which indicates 3% on the right side and 3% on the left side with 6% of total incidence. Imada et al, 17 also studied in 100 mandible and found six accessory mental foramen, three on right and left side. The findings of Shukla RK et al 18 in 96 mandibles a single accessory mental foramen was identified in 4.17% of the sample 7 reported 6.62% of the mandibles possessed accessory mental foramina.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Three AMF on the left side and three on the right side, which indicates 3% on the right side and 3% on the left side with 6% of total incidence. Imada et al, 17 also studied in 100 mandible and found six accessory mental foramen, three on right and left side. The findings of Shukla RK et al 18 in 96 mandibles a single accessory mental foramen was identified in 4.17% of the sample 7 reported 6.62% of the mandibles possessed accessory mental foramina.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Previous studies with panoramic radiographs reported incidences of less than 1% 6,9 . Studies with CBCT images have shown a much higher incidence, with prevalence ranging from 15.6% to 65% 2,[13][14][15] , thus reiterating that conventional radiographs are not suitable to detect anatomical variations of the mandibular canal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Topographically, it is located closer to the inner bone wall up to the mesial aspect of the first molar, moving across to the outer bone wall until it reaches the mental foramen 1 . The radiographic appearance of the mandibular canal is characterized by a radiolucent strip between two radiopaque lines 2 generally as a single structure, presenting different positions inside the body of the mandible in both the upperlower and the medial-lateral directions 3 with occasional duplicate pathways and bifurcations 295 295 295 295 295 nerve in the mandibular canal is of great importance to dentists, especially for those planning orthognathic surgery, mandibular reconstruction, extraction of third molars or installation of osseointegrated implants [6][7] . It is therefore paramount to investigate the frequency and classification of bifid mandibular canals using CBCT to aid surgical planning at posterior regions of the mandible, minimizing the risk of accidents and operative complications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It provides high resolution, cross-sectional view and diagnostic reliability at lower costs and radiation doses [1,12,18]. It allows detailed multiplanar evaluation of maxillofacial region to be conducted for further analysis of the anatomical structures which could not have been detected by conventional imaging modalities [4,6,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%