Oxford Handbooks Online 2014
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641604.013.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessing Words from the Mental Lexicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(90 reference statements)
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We measured the subjects' naming latencies and ERP amplitudes when naming target pictures preceded by morphologically transparent related compounds, shortly after learning (Session 1) and two days later (Session 2). We replicated the morphological priming effect previously found by Zwitserlood et al (2000) in German, as well as Schiller (2008, 2011) and Verdonschot et al (2012) in Dutch and Lensink et al (2014) in English (L2), using familiar compound words in a similar protocol (see Schiller and Verdonschot, 2014 for an overview). Our mean RT differences between the unrelated and the related familiar condition (17 ms in session 1 and 20 ms in session 2) are in the same ballpark as the findings of Schiller (2008, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We measured the subjects' naming latencies and ERP amplitudes when naming target pictures preceded by morphologically transparent related compounds, shortly after learning (Session 1) and two days later (Session 2). We replicated the morphological priming effect previously found by Zwitserlood et al (2000) in German, as well as Schiller (2008, 2011) and Verdonschot et al (2012) in Dutch and Lensink et al (2014) in English (L2), using familiar compound words in a similar protocol (see Schiller and Verdonschot, 2014 for an overview). Our mean RT differences between the unrelated and the related familiar condition (17 ms in session 1 and 20 ms in session 2) are in the same ballpark as the findings of Schiller (2008, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, the more frequently a word occurs, the more connections it has to other words in the mental lexicon (de Groot 1989;Steyvers and Tenenbaum 2005). Frequency can be argued to be one of the most important factors influencing the organization of the mental lexicon (Forster 1976), along with the individual's subjective familiarity with the presented lexical item (Harley 2014;Hallin and Van Lancker-Sidtis 2017).…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mental lexicon is often taken to refer to the part of our language processing system that hosts the word forms we know and their corresponding meanings, that is, a neurocognitive version of a dictionary. The retrieval of lexical items from the mental lexicon is called lexical access (for an overview see Schiller & Verdonschot, 2015). The meaning component of a lexical item, including conceptual-semantic processing, precedes the encoding of its form, that is, morphological processing (see overviews in Schiller & Verdonschot, 2019;Schiller, 2020) and phonological-phonetic processing (or phonological encoding; see Schiller, 2006, for a review).…”
Section: Language Production Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%