2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2016.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessing marker effects and heritability estimates from genome prediction by Bayesian regularized neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The dominant design of the relatively few applications of NN in GWP is the MLP (e.g., Ehret et al (2015) and Glória et al (2016)). Bellot et al (2018) compared deep learning models on large human SNP data combined with five phenotypes with varying levels of heritability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominant design of the relatively few applications of NN in GWP is the MLP (e.g., Ehret et al (2015) and Glória et al (2016)). Bellot et al (2018) compared deep learning models on large human SNP data combined with five phenotypes with varying levels of heritability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, one can argue that it is more important to focus on efficient regularization and sparsity than on modelling of complex structures when genomic data consists of SNPs. Glória et al [19] also found that more complex NN designs reduced the predictive accuracy compared to a simple one-layer one-node net when evaluated on simulated genotype/phenotype data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the usefulness of deep-learning for GWAS is limited, although some techniques exist for variable importance analysis e.g. [19, 38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These connections are directed by means of estimated weights, which measure the influence of the predictor variables on the response variable. In addition to weights, the bias ( ), also known as intercept, is estimated (Glória et al, 2016).…”
Section: Figure 1 -mentioning
confidence: 99%