Accessibility of Alabama government Web sites

Abstract

As the World Wide Web has assumed an increasingly important role in providing government information and services, the need to extend these resources to the portion of the population with disabilities has become readily apparent. In 1998, Congress amended Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to require federal government agencies and departments to ensure that their Web sites (as well as other electronic and information technology) are accessible and usable by federal employees with disabilities. Although Section 508 applies explicitly only to federal government Web sites, there are implications for the states and private sector as well. Accessible e-government means that governmental forums and services otherwise beyond the reach of disabled individuals are now easily within their grasp. This paper presents the results of an evaluation of the level of accessibility of selected state of Alabama government Web sites. While the results of this study indicate considerable improvement over earlier research, the level of accessibility remains low. The pressure to comply with accessibility standards can only be expected to increase in the future, but legislation on the state level may prove unnecessary. The adoption of standards at the federal level is generating significant momentum for both the public and private sectors. While accessibility may never reach 100%, the potential for improvement remains significant. D

The accessibility of Saudi Arabia government Web sites: an exploratory study

“…Their results show that the group of government Web sites has the highest compliance with the W3C WCAG compared to the other types of Web sites [12]. After Kurniawan and Zaphiris study, many studies have appeared to measure and evaluate the accessibility of US state-specific government Web sites, e.g., [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Consequently, by the end of year 2002, the momentum of measuring the accessibility of government Web sites worldwide has apparently increased.…”

Evaluating municipal websites: A methodological comparison of three think-aloud variants

“…Some reports have even investigated the online activities of municipalities worldwide (Choudrie, Ghinea & Weerakkody, 2004;Holzer et al, 2006). The topics addressed in these studies vary widely from the accessibility of municipal websites (Potter, 2003;Shi, 2007;Jaeger, 2006) to textual content (Eschenfelder, 2004;Eschenfelder & Miller, 2007) to government-citizen interaction (Chadwick & May, 2003;Welch & Fulla, 2005;Griffin & Halpin, 2005).…”

Analyzing Stakeholder Diversity in G2G Efforts: Combining Descriptive Stakeholder Theory and Dialectic Process Theory

“…This includes lack of national and international interoperability standards (Missier et al, 2003), accessibility standards (Potter, 2002), security standards (Hof, 2002), and standards for online 2 digital services (Kaylor et al, 2001). Second, developing system requirements that will be valid for the majority of citizens may be difficult (Lenk, 2002;Wimmer and Holler, 2003).…”