Distance and E‐Learning in Transition 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781118557686.ch9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Access and Efficiency in the Development of Distance Education and E‐Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…principle underpinning traditional DE practices and research was the increase of accessibility of DE programs by using affordable, and widely available, technologies. This principle was also supported by the operational mechanism of DE institutions: the mass production of independent study materials (Hülsmann, 2009;Perraton, 2000;Rumble, 2004;Woodley, 2008). The operation of online HE in ways that heavily emphasizes interactive and collaborative learning activities, on the other hand, tends to be costly and consequently to decrease the accessibility of online programs among disadvantaged students (Holmberg, 1995;Kanuka & Brooks, 2010).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…principle underpinning traditional DE practices and research was the increase of accessibility of DE programs by using affordable, and widely available, technologies. This principle was also supported by the operational mechanism of DE institutions: the mass production of independent study materials (Hülsmann, 2009;Perraton, 2000;Rumble, 2004;Woodley, 2008). The operation of online HE in ways that heavily emphasizes interactive and collaborative learning activities, on the other hand, tends to be costly and consequently to decrease the accessibility of online programs among disadvantaged students (Holmberg, 1995;Kanuka & Brooks, 2010).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…While DE had been much valued among distance educators and students (Wedemeyer, 1981), within the broader HE field, there had long been a prevailing perception on DE as ‗second-rate' education or ‗inferior' form of education that was nonetheless useful in particular circumstances (Hülsmann, 2009). Although the nature of learning at a distance had allowed DE programs to provide their students a higher level of accessibility (and flexibility) than that typically offered by face-to-face programs, the distance between teachers and students was seen as inevitably causing a lack of interaction between them, which was regarded as a major drawback of DE.…”
Section: The Technology-oriented Conceptualization Of Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Hülsmann (2009), the Achilles heel of distance education is the weak and limited interaction among students or between tutors and students, due to the distance and the lack of face-to-face communication. For over a decade now, all the educators involved in distance education, in order to overcome the above obstacles, they have shown an increased interest in using several information and communication technological tools over the Internet, as well as new strategies and terms about e-learning (Anderson & Garrison, 1998;Anderson, 2004;Anderson, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is the need for institutions to take into consideration the issue of social justice, with reference to the clearly important role which ICTs have to play in higher education. This is more so true in societies where there is the prevalence of previously and continuously disadvantaged groups and when data costs and access remain high relative to incomes (Hülsmann, 2016).…”
Section: Distance Education Management As a Link To Administrative Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%