2004
DOI: 10.1080/10635150490423962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accepting Partnership by Submission? Morphological Phylogenetics in a Molecular Millennium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
125
0
10

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
125
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…On top of this, morphological markers can affect one another and make difficult to predict pleiotropic effects (Andersen and Lübberstedt 2003). As a consequence, nowadays, there is a debate on the importance and the future of morphological studies, especially in the context of phylogenetic systematics (Jenner 2004). Application of a wide range of molecular markers has been the focus of many walnut studies during the past 30 years.…”
Section: Historical Overview Of Molecular Marker Development and Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On top of this, morphological markers can affect one another and make difficult to predict pleiotropic effects (Andersen and Lübberstedt 2003). As a consequence, nowadays, there is a debate on the importance and the future of morphological studies, especially in the context of phylogenetic systematics (Jenner 2004). Application of a wide range of molecular markers has been the focus of many walnut studies during the past 30 years.…”
Section: Historical Overview Of Molecular Marker Development and Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, it is seldom the case that morphological data can be seamlessly integrated from one study to the next without the need to revisit the original specimens. Additionally, the complexity of morphology in comparison with molecular sequences means that the former often requires a reinterpretation of the anatomical observations in the light of a new or a different combination of taxa (Rieppel and Kearney, 2002;Jenner, 2004a).…”
Section: Digital Atlas Of Ant Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, exploiting the data will require the continued refinement of database resources and bioinformatic pipelines (Minster and Connolly, 2006;Hajibabaei et al, 2011;Bik et al, 2012;Radom et al, 2012). Consequently, the collaboration between molecular ecologists and taxonomists is required for the accurate characterization of species and for the deposition of quality assured barcode sequences in public databases (Jenner, 2004). The improvement of reference databases and thus the ability to assign OTUs to known species will enable metabarcoding techniques to be more reliably used in monitoring surveys, with high potential for the detection of non-indigenous species.…”
Section: Use Of Metabarcoding To Study Marine Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%