2011
DOI: 10.1206/355.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Phylogenetic Analysis of Ant Morphology (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with Special Reference to the Poneromorph Subfamilies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
170
2
17

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
(242 reference statements)
9
170
2
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed diagnoses were given by Taylor (1965), Bolton (2003), Eguchi et al (2006), and Keller (2011). The material from Madagascar treated herein matches them almost perfectly with one exception.…”
Section: Hlsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Detailed diagnoses were given by Taylor (1965), Bolton (2003), Eguchi et al (2006), and Keller (2011). The material from Madagascar treated herein matches them almost perfectly with one exception.…”
Section: Hlsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Ants are among the most complex and social invertebrate animals as for their morphology, their physiology, their social organization and their behaviors. They are among the most morphologically evolved hymenoptera, having indeed a unique resting position of their labium, mandibles and maxilla (Keller, 2011), as well as a lot of glands emitting numerous, efficient pheromones (Billen & Morgan, 1998). Their societies are highly organized with a strong division of labor, an age-based polyethism and a social regulation (Hölldobler & Wilson, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to make this work more accessible, terminology largely follows the generalized hymenopteran set of Goulet & Huber (1993), with clarifications for taxon-specific terms. Those terms unique to Formicidae stem from Hölldobler & Wilson (1990) and Bolton (1994), and many pertinent to this work are well-illustrated in the works of Keller (2011) and Yoshimura & Fisher (2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%