2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptability of an intravaginal ring for simultaneously preventing HIV infection and pregnancy: Qualitative findings of the Kisumu Combined Ring Study, 2019

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, initial concerns over tablet color and size, and ring insertion and comfort, decreased after the opportunity to use placebo versions of these delivery forms. Similarly, concerns over vaginal insertion of a nanofiber fabric decreased after participants watched the product dissolve ( 6 , 18 , 31 , 35 , 38 , 40 , 51 ). Additionally, ratings and concerns for known and used products such as injectables and tablets changed minimally after demonstrations, educational videos, or actual use ( 6 , 18 , 38 , 51 ), whereas increased exposure to and experience with novel delivery forms increased acceptability ratings and comfort ( 38 , 39 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, initial concerns over tablet color and size, and ring insertion and comfort, decreased after the opportunity to use placebo versions of these delivery forms. Similarly, concerns over vaginal insertion of a nanofiber fabric decreased after participants watched the product dissolve ( 6 , 18 , 31 , 35 , 38 , 40 , 51 ). Additionally, ratings and concerns for known and used products such as injectables and tablets changed minimally after demonstrations, educational videos, or actual use ( 6 , 18 , 38 , 51 ), whereas increased exposure to and experience with novel delivery forms increased acceptability ratings and comfort ( 38 , 39 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overwhelmingly, end users preferred products that did not alter their menstrual cycles ( 6 , 29 , 35 , 40 , 42 ), although some preferred lighter menses ( 39 ). Additionally, end users had mixed opinions about using a vaginally-administered product during menstruation, with some noting a dislike of the idea of inserting a product while menstruating; others had concerns about product displacement or reduced efficacy during menstruation ( 25 , 31 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral PrEP users and participants in studies of oral MPT products express concerns about lack of privacy to take and store pills leading to inadvertent disclosure and ensuing stigma related to PrEP use or assumptions of HIV infection [ 28 , 30 , 34 37 ]. While many end users highlight the ability to use vaginal rings discreetly as a positive attribute [ 28 , 33 , 38 ], others express hesitations about the ring being detected by partners during sex [ 28 , 34 , 39 , 40 ]. While contraceptive injections avoid many of these challenges and are, indeed, widely used in sub-Saharan Africa, the first-generation injectable option (CAB-LA) requires reinjection every two months, is painful, and necessitates frequent clinic visits, a potential access barrier [ 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These provider and clinic challenges are similar across all types of current PrEP; these also would be likely to exist for future delivery systems including future multi-prevention technologies that may integrate PrEP with STI-prevention and/or contraception. 22,23,25 One way to overcome these challenges would be to ensure that implementation issues are included in the drug research in the first place. For example, rather than studying only the HIV and safety endpoints in a Phase 3 study, protocols could examine service delivery structures to support the specific novel intervention under study.…”
Section: Provider and Clinic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 21 These are cross-cutting barriers to PrEP uptake, impacting the scale-up of both oral and injectable PrEP agents as well as newer delivery systems expected soon. 22 25 Knowledge of these barriers allows for planning earlier in the drug-development pathway rather than waiting for a demonstration of efficacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%