2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceleration Time of Systolic Coronary Flow Velocity to Diagnose Coronary Stenosis in Patients with Microvascular Dysfunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) is dependent on the combined effects of epicardial coronary stenosis and microvascular dysfunction [ 3 , 12 , 13 ]. For coronary flow study, we administered adenosine triphosphate (0.14 mg/kg/min) intravenously for 2 min after the baseline coronary flow velocity (CFV) of the LAD was recorded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) is dependent on the combined effects of epicardial coronary stenosis and microvascular dysfunction [ 3 , 12 , 13 ]. For coronary flow study, we administered adenosine triphosphate (0.14 mg/kg/min) intravenously for 2 min after the baseline coronary flow velocity (CFV) of the LAD was recorded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFVs were recorded at the baseline and during hyperemia and averaged over five cardiac cycles. CFVR was defined as the ratio of mean diastolic CFV during hyperemia to that at the baseline [ 12 , 13 ]. All measurements were performed by the experienced investigator who was blinded to all other data using EchoPAC 6.1; GE Healthcare, Horten, Norway.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the evaluation of ≥50% stenosis is more meaningful, but there is no relevant literature report. In addition, several studies found that AT was an useful ultrasound parameter to predict internal carotid artery stenosis, lower extremity peripheral artery stenosis, renal artery stenosis, hepatic artery stenosis and coronary artery stenosis (32)(33)(34)(35)(36). However, its efficacy in evaluating SA stenosis is unclear.…”
Section: Ultrasound Parameters In Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%