Accelerating the Integration of Distributed Water Solutions: A Conceptual Financing Model from the Electricity Sector

Abstract

Modern challenges require new approaches to urban water management. One solution in the portfolio of potential strategies is the integration of distributed water infrastructure, practices, and technologies into existing systems. However, many practical barriers have prevented the widespread adoption of these systems in the US. The objective of this paper is to address these challenges by developing a conceptual model encompassing regulatory, financial, and governance components that can be used to incorporate new distributed water solutions into our current network. To construct the model, case studies of successfully implemented distributed electricity systems, specifically energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies, were examined to determine how these solutions have become prominent in recent years and what lessons can be applied to the water sector in a similar pursuit. The proposed model includes four action-oriented elements: catalyzing change, establishing funding sources, using resource pathways, and creating innovative governance structures. As illustrated in the model, the water sector should use suite of coordinated policies to promote change, engage end users through fiscal incentives, and encourage research, development and dissemination of new technologies over time.

Do water savings persist? Using survival models to plan for long-term responses to extreme drought

“…Key to maintaining reliable service in this environment-while avoiding unnecessary investments in large, capital intensive projects-is understanding how these disruptions affect both demand and supply. Promoting water efficiency among customers can lock in permanent savings, improving resilience to future shortages, taking pressure off aging infrastructure, and staving off costly infrastructure investments [7]. Conservation is also a valuable buffer against supply shortages: percapita urban water use fell 37% in 2002-2008 during Australia's mega-drought [8]; household water consumption declined by roughly 50% during Cape Town's 2015-2018 crisis [9]-helping it avert its dreaded 'Day Zero' .…”

A Systematic Literature Review of Infrastructure Governance: Cross-sectoral Lessons for Transformative Governance Approaches

“…As mega-projects are seen as costly with high risks, larger infrastructure networks are posited as an alternative, better distributing risks and better enabling fund-raising capacity. Quesnel, Ajami, and Wyss (2017), for example, propose infrastructure bundling (combining many projects into one larger group) as a low-risk, strategic way to expand financing accessibility for smaller projects. Others propose rebuilding the capacity of public authorities, and decommodifying critical infrastructure supported through approaches such as green bonds (Hall et al 2019), state investment banks (Geddes, Schmidt, and Steffen 2018), or re-municipalisation and public ownership of infrastructure (Friedländer, Röber, and Schaefer 2021).…”

Investment valuation model for sustainable infrastructure systems

“…In this line, studies raised and developed new investment valuation models applied to infrastructure systems (Cooper and Nyborg, 2018;DiMuro et al, 2014;Hajji et al, 2017;Ho and Liu, 2002;Huang and Pi, 2014;Jackowicz et al, 2017;Jeong et al, 2016;Kashani et al, 2015;Kim et al, 2013;Lu et al, 2016;Pantelias and Zhang, 2010;Wibowo, 2006;Yan et al, 2017) and significant works on sustainable infrastructure financing. For example, Büyüközkan and Karabulut (2018) provided a structured overview of analytical assessment methods into conceptual sustainability frameworks; Lee and Zhong (2015) developed a financing instrument that securitises future income in the form of a hybrid bond for renewable energy projects; Shen et al (2016) examined the impacts of the contribution distribution between public and private sectors on project sustainability performance; Shen et al (2002) developed an alternative quantitative model for assessing the feasibility that a construction project gets involved in contributing to sustainable development; Quesnel et al (2017) developed a conceptual financing model for the water sector based on the electricity sector; Quesnel and Ajami (2018) examined advanced water financing through public benefit funds; and Shan et al (2017) analysed innovative models and mechanisms for sustainable construction finance. However, none of the above neither reported nor explicitly addressed how financing mechanisms and sustainability issues can be combined to create new ways to capture financial value and thus, encourage private investors.…”