2013
DOI: 10.1017/s0030605312000373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abundance and density estimates for common leopard Panthera pardus and clouded leopard Neofelis nebulosa in Manas National Park, Assam, India

Abstract: Effective conservation of rare carnivores requires reliable estimates of population density for prioritizing investments and assessing the effectiveness of conservation interventions. We used camera traps and capture-recapture analysis to provide the first reliable abundance and density estimates for the common leopard Panthera pardus and clouded leopard Neofelis nebulosa in Manas National Park, India. In 57 days of camera trapping, with a total of 4,275 camera-trap days, we photo-captured 27 individually iden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
40
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
7
40
5
Order By: Relevance
“…While tiger density in the CH is half that in the lowland areas of CNP and Bardia National Park (Dhakal et al 2014), it is still comparable to multiple sites in India, such as Pakke Tiger Reserve (Chauhan et al 2006), Chilla Range (Harihar et al 2011) and Tadoba and Bhadra Tiger Reserve (Karanth et al 2004), and higher in density than in Bhutan (Wang & Macdonald 2009), Myanmar (Lynam et al 2009) and Malaysia (Kawanishi & Sunquist 2004). Leopard density in the Churia is very similar to the high density areas in the bhabhars of Parsa Wildlife Reserve in Nepal , the mountains of Kuiburi National Park in Thailand (Steinmetz et al 2013), Manas Tiger Reserve in India (Borah et al 2013), and the Irrigated Valley in Akole Tahsil, Maharastra, India (Athreya et al 2013). This highlights the suitability of the Churia habitat for leopards.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…While tiger density in the CH is half that in the lowland areas of CNP and Bardia National Park (Dhakal et al 2014), it is still comparable to multiple sites in India, such as Pakke Tiger Reserve (Chauhan et al 2006), Chilla Range (Harihar et al 2011) and Tadoba and Bhadra Tiger Reserve (Karanth et al 2004), and higher in density than in Bhutan (Wang & Macdonald 2009), Myanmar (Lynam et al 2009) and Malaysia (Kawanishi & Sunquist 2004). Leopard density in the Churia is very similar to the high density areas in the bhabhars of Parsa Wildlife Reserve in Nepal , the mountains of Kuiburi National Park in Thailand (Steinmetz et al 2013), Manas Tiger Reserve in India (Borah et al 2013), and the Irrigated Valley in Akole Tahsil, Maharastra, India (Athreya et al 2013). This highlights the suitability of the Churia habitat for leopards.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Using bycatch from national tiger survey, we have estimated density and site‐use probability of a cryptic species, the clouded leopard, following methodologies developed in previous studies (Borah et al., ; Mohamad et al., for N. nebulosa ; Sollmann et al., ; Haidir et al., for N. diardi ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Indian leopard ( Panthera pardus fusca ) is an obligate carnivore widely distributed in the Indian subcontinent (Borah et al, ). This species is categorized as near‐threatened as per IUCN Red Data Book (Henschell et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%