1996
DOI: 10.1016/0048-9697(96)05288-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absorption of radiocaesium by sheep after ingestion of contaminated soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) and transfer from the gastrointestinal tract to the circulatory system has been shown to be source dependent. Studies orally administering soil-associated radiocaesium to sheep have estimated A t values in the range 2.0 Â 10 À2 -0.19 (Cooke et al, 1996;Beresford et al, 2000a). In one study, the same contaminated soil was administered to both cattle and sheep (Mayes et al, 1993;Beresford et al, 2000a) but the A t value determined for cattle (0.2) was an order of magnitude higher than that determined in sheep.…”
Section: Values Derived From Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…1) and transfer from the gastrointestinal tract to the circulatory system has been shown to be source dependent. Studies orally administering soil-associated radiocaesium to sheep have estimated A t values in the range 2.0 Â 10 À2 -0.19 (Cooke et al, 1996;Beresford et al, 2000a). In one study, the same contaminated soil was administered to both cattle and sheep (Mayes et al, 1993;Beresford et al, 2000a) but the A t value determined for cattle (0.2) was an order of magnitude higher than that determined in sheep.…”
Section: Values Derived From Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The availability of 137 Cs associated with silt from the Ravenglass Estuary for absorption in the ruminant gut has previously been shown to be <10% of that for Cs incorporated into vegetation or ingested as CsCl (see review by Beresford et al, 2000). Apart from Cs there is only limited evidence to suggest that the availability for absorption in the ruminant gut of Am and Pu from saltmarsh vegetation and soil contaminated by marine discharges from the Sellafield reprocessing plant is low compared to 'recommended' values (see Ham et al, 1989;Harrison, 1991;Cooke et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For instance, ingested soil can contribute considerably to the radiocaesium intake of grazing animals [23]. The bioavailability of radiocaesium from a number of different soils has been shown to be considerably lower than of radiocaesium incorporated into vegetation via root uptake [21,24]. Consequently, when soil ingestion represents a large proportion of the dietary radiocaesium intake, a lower A a value would be expected.…”
Section: Estimation Of Radiocaesium Intakementioning
confidence: 98%