2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2727561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute in situ measurement of surface dangling bonds during a-Si:H growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This prediction is in agreement ͑i.e., of the order of magnitude of 10 −2 ͒ with ESR measurements, 13 but it is higher than the DB coverage measured by Aarts et al 14 These surface DBs promote surface hydride dissociation reactions from SiH 3͑s͒ to SiH 2͑s͒ through low-barrier DB-mediated pathways ͑E a = 0.16-0.33 eV͒, but their surface coverage is low dur- ing a-Si:H growth throughout the temperature range of interest. The role of DBs in promoting hydride dissociation and sequential dissociation reactions has also been inferred based on experiments.…”
Section: -6mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This prediction is in agreement ͑i.e., of the order of magnitude of 10 −2 ͒ with ESR measurements, 13 but it is higher than the DB coverage measured by Aarts et al 14 These surface DBs promote surface hydride dissociation reactions from SiH 3͑s͒ to SiH 2͑s͒ through low-barrier DB-mediated pathways ͑E a = 0.16-0.33 eV͒, but their surface coverage is low dur- ing a-Si:H growth throughout the temperature range of interest. The role of DBs in promoting hydride dissociation and sequential dissociation reactions has also been inferred based on experiments.…”
Section: -6mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This dangling-bond-based growth model has been used to explain the temperature independence of the surface reaction and sticking probabilities during a-Si:H film growth. Nevertheless, a growth model based on these surface reactions cannot describe satisfactorily the surface defect densities and their impact on the growth process, as observed by in situ and real-time dangling-bond density measurements using electron spin resonance ͑ESR͒ by Yamasaki et al 13 and high-sensitivity evanescent wave cavity ring-down spectroscopy by Aarts et al; 14 according to these measurements, the dangling-bond creation rate is lower than the actual a-Si:H growth rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface radical sites (the so-called dangling bonds) are generally believed to be growth sites for the thin film; the absorption of these surface dangling bonds, as well as of bulk dangling bonds, was probed with the folded resonator. It has been shown that the creation rate of the surface dangling bond during thin-film growth was 60 times too small to account for the actual growth rate (87).…”
Section: Evanescent-wave Cavity Ring-down Spectroscopy Using Folded Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same folded resonator with mirror coatings centered at 1205 nm has been utilized as an in situ probe for measuring dangling bond defects during growth of a hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) thin film on the TIR surface of the resonator (87). Such films play an important role in the development of low-cost flexible solar cells, but mechanistic insight into the exact growth mechanism of the deposited films is limited.…”
Section: Evanescent-wave Cavity Ring-down Spectroscopy Using Folded Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As O-H and C-H groups have been observed in the Er-doped Y 2 O 3 , an attempt was made to detect these species by CRDS by probing possible overtone and combination modes of O-H and C-H vibrations. Recently, CRDS in the evanescent-wave configuration 46,47 ͑EW-CRDS͒ was found to be highly sensitive for the detection of C-H overtones of surface adsorbed chloroethylenes, 48 surface Si dangling bonds in amorphous hydrogenated silicon ͑a-Si:H͒ films, 49 and O-H combination bands on amorphous SiO 2 . 50 Using the linear cavity in the current experiments, no absorption peaks could be observed in the wavelength region of 1000-1125 nm; however, an absorption peak could be clearly observed between 1360 and 1400 nm for the second wavelength scan, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Quantification Of Oh and Chmentioning
confidence: 99%