2000
DOI: 10.1519/1533-4287(2000)014<0182:aarspf>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute and Relative Strength Performance Following Creatine Monohydrate Supplementation Combined With Periodized Resistance Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic premise behind the use of a 5-to 6-day loading phase is to maximize muscle creatine concentrations in a short period of time (12). Still, other studies using a similar loading-phase dosing regimen and supplement duration were unable to see any significant performance improvements (6,7,16,25). This was likely related to the performance variable evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic premise behind the use of a 5-to 6-day loading phase is to maximize muscle creatine concentrations in a short period of time (12). Still, other studies using a similar loading-phase dosing regimen and supplement duration were unable to see any significant performance improvements (6,7,16,25). This was likely related to the performance variable evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 22 studies, 14 of which were already included in the meta-analysis by Nissen and Sharp (2003), met the inclusion criteria of Rawson and Volek (2003) and the remaining, except three (Stevenson and Dudley, 2001;Syrotuik et al, 2000;Syrotuik et al, 2001), were considered in EFSA Journal 2011;9(7):2303 the meta-analysis by Branch (2003). Two of the three references were provided in the consolidated list as individual studies (Stevenson and Dudley, 2001;Syrotuik et al, 2001).…”
Section: Scientific Substantiation Of the Claimed Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine upper and lower body strength measures, all subjects underwent a multiple repetition maximum (mRM) bilateral machine incline leg press (LP) and a free weight bench press (BP) test, as previously reported by Syrotuik et al (19). Briefl y, this involved measuring the maximum weight that each subject could lift to failure for eight repetitions of each strength exercise using a standardized protocol.…”
Section: Physiological Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial training loads were established from the mRM strength assessment on each exercise, as previously noted. Volume and intensity were progressively overloaded using a periodized program with the aid of a computer software program (B. E. Software) (19). Core lifts were progressively overloaded using 70 to 95% of predicted 1RM and between 2 to 10 repetitions for 4 to 5 sets while supplementary lifts were overloaded using ranges of 65 to 85% of predicted 1RM, 8 to 10 repetitions for 2 to 3 sets.…”
Section: Physical Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%