1996
DOI: 10.1007/s0021663550878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute and/or relative detection limits in laser-based analysis: the end justifies the means

Abstract: The absolute limit of detection usually expresses the minimum amount of analyte detectable, while the relative limit of detection refers to the minimum concentration of analyte detectable. These concepts and their differences are obviously familiar to all analytical spectroscopists. Nevertheless, the two definitions are used liberally in the literature. For example, it is not uncommon to refer to exceptional sub-femtograms detection limits for a technique used to analyse ultratrace levels of an element in wate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since LIBS is sampling only minute amounts of sample, relative detection limits are not inherently relevant as the absolute counterpart. 202 In fact, the common knowledge that LIBS is not as sensitive as other analytical methods is somewhat misleading, in the sense that an ∼1 ppm relative detection limit (which admittedly does not sound very spectacular nowadays) often translates into an absolute detection limit in the femtogram range (10 −15 g). The advent of micro-sampling at the sub-micrometer level is expected to even lower such a limit into the attogram range (10 −18 g).…”
Section: Quantitative Libsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since LIBS is sampling only minute amounts of sample, relative detection limits are not inherently relevant as the absolute counterpart. 202 In fact, the common knowledge that LIBS is not as sensitive as other analytical methods is somewhat misleading, in the sense that an ∼1 ppm relative detection limit (which admittedly does not sound very spectacular nowadays) often translates into an absolute detection limit in the femtogram range (10 −15 g). The advent of micro-sampling at the sub-micrometer level is expected to even lower such a limit into the attogram range (10 −18 g).…”
Section: Quantitative Libsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important not to fall in the mistake of comparing trace analysis and microanalysis. 43 What can be said beyond any reasonable doubt is that LIBS may routinely achieve absolute detection limits in the femtogram range with a single pulse vaporizing low ng of sample.…”
Section: Pushing the Sensitivity Of Libsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of the persistent aerosol were also investigated and optimized for best performance . The matrix effects of compound speciation were described in detail, ,, as well as those related to the matrix composition. ,, …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%