ABR differences before and after dialyses

Niedzielska, G; Katska, E; Sikora, Przemysław; Szajner-Milart, I

doi:10.1016/s0165-5876(99)00007-5

Cited by 17 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In other words, a single session of hemodialysis helped improve, but did not restore, auditory neural function. This finding is in agreement with Niedzielska et al, [10] who noted a reduction of absolute and interpeak wave latency in a substantial number of patients following hemodialysis, but the values remained in the abnormal range. In agreement with the above findings, Orendorz-Franczkowska et al [11] also reported the appearance of distortion product otoacoustic emissions following hemodialysis, which concurs with our finding of improving wave I latency.…”

Section: Pre-vs Post-hemodialysissupporting

confidence: 92%

“…This correlation was noted for wave III and V absolute latencies at the 10/s click rate, and to wave I and V absolute latencies at the 55/s click rate. The present study found no correlations between biochemical measures and changes in ABR absolute or interpeak latencies, in agreement with Baldini et al, [5] Niedzelsca et al, [10] and Gafter et al [12] A comparison of ABR recordings prior to and following hemodialysis in this study showed a significant improvement in wave I and V latencies in the slow repetition rate and wave V latency in the fast repetition rate.…”

Section: Pre-vs Post-hemodialysissupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Niedzielska et al [10] analyzed ABRs obtained from children with end stage CRF. They reported shorter latencies of waves I, III, and V after a session of hemodialysis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Auditory Brainstem Responses in Patients under Treatment of Hemodialysis

Aspris

Thodi²,

Balatsouras

et al. 2008

Renal Failure

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study evaluated the effects of end stage chronic renal failure (CRF) on auditory function and changes in auditory function following a single session of hemodialysis. The experimental group included 31 patients with end-stage renal failure on chronic hemodialysis. The control group consisted of 31 healthy volunteers. The patients were examined prior to and following a session of hemodialysis. Measurements included pure tone audiometry, tympanometry and acoustic reflex measurements, auditory brainstem responses (ABR), and blood now chemistry parameters. Controls underwent the same test battery, with the exception of biochemical and hematological assessment. Prior to hemodialysis sessions, all ABR latencies except interpeak latency I-III were significantly prolonged in the experimental group. A comparison between controls and the experimental group following hemodialysis indicated that wave V absolute latency and interpeak latencies III-V and I-V were significantly prolonged in the slow repetition rate paradigm. In the fast repetition rate, absolute latencies of waves I and V and III-V interpeak latencies were prolonged in the experimental group. Comparison of ABR recordings prior to and following hemodialysis showed overall significant difference between the measures. Post hoc analysis showed a significant improvement in wave I and V latencies in the slow repetition rate and wave V latency in the fast repetition rate. This study showed that neural conduction along the auditory pathway is delayed in patients with end stage CRF as compared to healthy subjects. Dialysis sessions improve overall neural auditory function. However, patients with end stage CRF show delayed conduction even after a session of hemodialysis.

show abstract

Section: Pre-vs Post-hemodialysissupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Pre-vs Post-hemodialysissupporting

confidence: 92%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Auditory Brainstem Responses in Patients under Treatment of Hemodialysis

Aspris

Thodi²,

Balatsouras

et al. 2008

Renal Failure

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Twenty normal healthy children served as controls. OAE testing was failed in 11.1% of patients on HD but in none of the patients on conservative [11,12,16,17,21]. Our results are also in the reported ranges.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

“…adult CRF patients and between 15% and 79% in dialytic ones [11][12][13][14][15]. There is only limited number of studies evaluating hearing abnormalities in children with CRF or ESRD.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%