2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-012-9691-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

About the structure of cellulose: debating the Lindman hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
171
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
171
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…25 In order to stimulate discussion he invited a number of leading researchers in the field to critically examine our views. 26 Unsurprisingly it was found that our views were far from novel or original but that similar findings could be seen in earlier publications. [27][28][29][30] However, such contributions had essentially drowned in a flood of publications identifying hydrogen bonding as the main reason for the insolubility of cellulose in water.…”
Section: Purposesupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25 In order to stimulate discussion he invited a number of leading researchers in the field to critically examine our views. 26 Unsurprisingly it was found that our views were far from novel or original but that similar findings could be seen in earlier publications. [27][28][29][30] However, such contributions had essentially drowned in a flood of publications identifying hydrogen bonding as the main reason for the insolubility of cellulose in water.…”
Section: Purposesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…46 -Cellulose biosynthesis is affected by the presence of hydrophobic substances. 26,47,48 -Ionic liquids are good solvents for cellulose. 49,50 Since these are strongly amphiphilic (and can be characterized as weak surfactants) they fit well into the picture of hydrophobic interactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For functional groups on cations such as alkyl-, allyl-, acid-, and ether-, the order of α value was , and Cl -had stronger electron-donating ability, and were easier to break the hydrogen bonds in cellulose to achieve higher solubility, which was consistent with the previous studies (Fukaya et al 2008;Glasser et al 2012).…”
Section: Effect Of Solvent Parameterssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Over decades the hydrogen bonds network in cellulose has been claimed as the reason of the crystalline structure of cellulose and the limitations in cellulose dissolution (Bodvik et al 2010;Zhang et al 2002), while the amphiphilic nature of cellulose has probably been underestimated (Medronho et al 2012. Thus, when developing efficient solvents for cellulose dissolution, not only the intermolecular hydrogen bonds need to be overcome, but also the hydrophobic chain interactions have to be minimized (Glasser et al 2012;Medronho et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%