About case reports and the perverse application of reasonable principles

Goihman-Yahr, Mauricio

doi:10.1111/ijd.13186

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nevertheless, the benefits of case reports, such as informing the scientific community about new diseases or treatment methods should not be ignored. Furthermore, case reports have also become a significant contributor to initiate and/or improve the preparation of a scientific article for recruiters ( 20 , 21 ). In the presented study, in contrast to the common beliefs concerning the low citation potential of a case report, we found that case reports published in the TAO in the years 2015 to 2019 had received considerable number of citations (46 citations for 63 article) which may support the ongoing significance of the case reports in the scientific publication.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

What Has Changed in the Last Decade in the Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology?

Bayram

2021

TAO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The primary aim of the study was to perform sequential analyses together with a citation analysis on the characteristics of the studies published in the Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology (TAO) in the periods of 2010–2014 and 2015–2019. Methods: The studies published in the indicated periods were reviewed for study type, study topic, language and country of origin. Then, the citation analysis of the articles was performed through the Google Scholar and Web of Science (WoS) databases for the indicated periods. The estimated annual impact factors (EIF) of TAO from 2017 to 2020 were calculated by dividing the total number of citations performed in the projected year to the total number of citable articles published in the preceding two years. Results: The total numbers of articles published from 2010 to 2014 and from 2015 to 2019 were 144 and 214, respectively. In 2010 to 2014, the most frequent study topic was head and neck with case reports ranking highest among study types. In 2015–2019, the most frequent study type had changed to original investigation and topic to general otorhinolaryngology. There was a remarkable increase in the total number of citations in 2015-2019 according to Google Scholar and WoS databases. Also, there was a remarkable increase in the EIF values for 2019 and 2020. Conclusion: Although the increase in the number of citations and impact factor values cannot be appreciated as a single indicator for the success of a journal, the results of the presented study showed a promising advancement in the scientific quality of the TAO, driven by the inclusion of the journal to national and international indexes and by changing the language of the journal to English, as well as the well-orchestrated editorial efforts.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

What Has Changed in the Last Decade in the Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology?

Bayram

2021

TAO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is easier for young authors to prepare a case report because it is shorter and does not require the application of a serious methodological or biostatistical method (3,10).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Do Case Reports Still Have a Place in Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology?

Erdağ

2017

Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

About case reports and the perverse application of reasonable principles

Cited by 2 publications

References 6 publications

What Has Changed in the Last Decade in the Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology?

What Has Changed in the Last Decade in the Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology?

Do Case Reports Still Have a Place in Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About