2009
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.49.1792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal α to γ Transformation Behavior of Steels with a Martensite and Bainite Microstructure at a Slow Reheating Rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanism of variant selection of transforming γ has been discussed in the literature. In studies on the texture memory effect during α−γ−α transformation [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] , it is commonly suggested that the γ texture after the reverse transformation is not randomly selected but is determined under the rule on the variant selection of transforming γ. Various models to explain the variant selection rules of transforming γ during reverse transformation have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism of variant selection of transforming γ has been discussed in the literature. In studies on the texture memory effect during α−γ−α transformation [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] , it is commonly suggested that the γ texture after the reverse transformation is not randomly selected but is determined under the rule on the variant selection of transforming γ. Various models to explain the variant selection rules of transforming γ during reverse transformation have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6] Authors also confirmed in the previous study that the reversed austenite preferentially nucleated at LBs rather than prior austenite grain boundaries (PAGBs) in 13%Cr-6%Ni martensitic stainless steel reversion-treated at 913 K. 7) On the contrary, some researchers reported that the nucleation behavior of austenite was influenced by the heating rate in low carbon steels; acicular austenite grains were frequently formed within a prior austenite grain under a low heating rate, while the granular ones tended to be formed mainly on PAGBs when the heating rate was increased. [2][3][4][5][6] This result suggests that the shape and nucleation site of reversed austenite would depend on the temperature at which the nucleation occurs. Since the size and dispersion of austenite nuclei affect the final microstructure after completion of reversion, it is necessary to understand the nucleation behavior for controlling mechanical properties of steels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) The nucleation and growth of reversed austenite during heating process are regarded to play critical roles in "austenite memory". [5][6][7][9][10][11][12][13]17) In order to make clear the mechanisms of "austenite memory", it's critical to investigate the formation mechanism of the reversed austenite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,8,11,[13][14][15][16][18][19][20][21] It is commonly accepted that there are two kinds of reversed austenite formation mechanisms, namely "acicular" and "globular" mechanisms, respectively. Globular austenite tends to nucleate at original austenite grain boundaries or inside the lathes with substrate of precipitates, thus disintegrate the original austenite grain and lead to grain refinement 11,13,16,18) In the "acicular" mechanism, acicular austenite nucleates at lath boundaries and has a K-S orientation relationship with the matrix, and recovery of original austenite grain happens after phase transformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation