1962
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1962.tb02042.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal Mothering as a Cause of Mental Subnormality—i. A Critique of Some Classic Studies of Maternal Deprivation in the Light of Possible Congenital Factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1962
1962
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is confirmed by the literature already quoted, by other literature on male vulnerability to disorders early in life (e.g. Murphy 1947, Stott 1962, Schaffer and Emerson 1964 and by our personal experience.…”
Section: Diagnosis: the Clinical Picture Of The Syndromesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is confirmed by the literature already quoted, by other literature on male vulnerability to disorders early in life (e.g. Murphy 1947, Stott 1962, Schaffer and Emerson 1964 and by our personal experience.…”
Section: Diagnosis: the Clinical Picture Of The Syndromesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…* Burlingham 1964, Fraiburg 1964, Freedman 1964, Ross et a / . 1967, Williams 1969, Smith et al 1969 t Stark 1967 (Observations in 34 children, 4 to 9* years, all showing EEG abnormalities and failure of f Stott 1962;Webster 1963;Menolascino 1965a,b;Bijou 1966;Gardner 1967;Phillips 1967. language skills).…”
Section: Table 1vmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, Pinneau's (1955) detailed review strongly suggested that maternal separation was, at best, of minor importance in Spitz's studies. This and subsequent investigations (e.g., Caldwell, Hersher, Lipton, Richmond, Stern, Eddy, Drachman, & Rockman, 1963;Gardner, Hawkes, & Burchinal, 1961;Schaffer & Emerson, 1964;Stott, 1962;Yarrow, 1964) have made it evident that Bowlby's and Spitz's rather unequivocal conclusions concerning the effects of maternal deprivation were based on the effects of many confounded variables. Stott (1962) in particular presented a strong case for the organic bases of much of what had been conceived of as psychological damage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…IN THE first article (Stott, 1962a) evidence was quoted which suggested that congenital factors may account for some of the defects of personality and intellect hitherto attributed to maternal deprivation. Many cases of mental defect are undoubtedly genetic or at least congenital in origin, but in cases showing no specific morphological stigmata there is more room for an interaction of congenital and postnatal environmental factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%