CVPR 2011 2011
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal detection using interaction energy potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
108
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
108
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5 shows the ROC curve of the abnormal behavior recognition on the UMN dataset for the proposed method using spatial+temporal descriptor. The performance of the proposed method is compared with state-of-the-art methods including BoTG [14], interaction energy potentials (IEP) [11], sparse reconstruction cost (SRC) [12], social force (SF) [8], streakline potential (SP) [10] and optical flow (OF). Table II …”
Section: Abnormal Behavior Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…5 shows the ROC curve of the abnormal behavior recognition on the UMN dataset for the proposed method using spatial+temporal descriptor. The performance of the proposed method is compared with state-of-the-art methods including BoTG [14], interaction energy potentials (IEP) [11], sparse reconstruction cost (SRC) [12], social force (SF) [8], streakline potential (SP) [10] and optical flow (OF). Table II …”
Section: Abnormal Behavior Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gave a better representation of the flow in comparison with common flow representations, by more accurately recognizing the temporal and spatial changes in the scene. The use of potential function was also presented in [11] for abnormal crowd detection. An interaction energy potential function was designed to model the current behavior states of the subjects and their actions were represented by their velocities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, J. Kim et al [1] uses the Markov Random Field (MRF) model and the maximum a posteriori (MAP) to estimate the abnormal degree, Y. Zhang [2] et al combines motion and appearance cues for anomaly detection based on Support Vector Data Description (SVDD). Totally, the abnormal events, including vehicle abnormal behavior [3,4], restricted-area access [5], group fighting [6] and carrying cases [7] can be detected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%