2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.psy.0000188401.55394.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal Affective Modulation of Somatosensory Brain Processing Among Patients With Fibromyalgia

Abstract: Our data suggest an abnormal processing of nonpainful somatosensory information in FM, especially when somatic signals are arising from the body within an aversive stimulus context. These findings provide further support for the use of biopsychosocial models for understanding FM and other chronic pain states.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
65
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
8
65
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have provided EEG evidence for this early influence of stimulus significance on sensory processes by examining Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SEPs; Junghofer et al 2001;Keil et al 2003).Early sensory components that occur before 100 ms in the EEG ERP waveform, specifically P50 and N80, are thought to originate from primary sensory cortex regions that are responsive when detecting sensory input (Montoya et al 2005). Importantly, there appear to be threat related differences in these early sensory components.…”
Section: Motivated Attention and Painmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Researchers have provided EEG evidence for this early influence of stimulus significance on sensory processes by examining Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SEPs; Junghofer et al 2001;Keil et al 2003).Early sensory components that occur before 100 ms in the EEG ERP waveform, specifically P50 and N80, are thought to originate from primary sensory cortex regions that are responsive when detecting sensory input (Montoya et al 2005). Importantly, there appear to be threat related differences in these early sensory components.…”
Section: Motivated Attention and Painmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Importantly, high NA appears to be a vulnerability factor for MUS when it interacts with increased self-focused attention (Gendolla et al, 2005), with previous experiences of somatic events and/or with somatic concerns (Bogaerts et al, 2014;Van den Bergh et al, 1997). As trait anxiety is associated with elevated sensitivity to threat (Hariri, 2009;Yiend, 2010) and compromised inhibitory systems for counter-regulating unpleasantness, it is likely that these mechanisms are involved in the association between high trait NA persons and MUS (Bishop, 2009;Montoya et al, 2005;Tillisch et al, 2011;Van Oudenhove and Aziz, 2013). Recently, the concept of central sensitization has been advanced to capture the idea of hyper-responsivity to various somatosensory stimuli in patients with functional somatic syndromes, characterized by elevated threat and salience detection, and a reduced capacity to down-regulate emotional responses (Bourke et al, 2015;Nijs et al, 2012 for reviews).…”
Section: Threat and Negative Affect (Na)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond basic principles of aversive brain function, future investigations could use the present findings for neuropsychiatric populations. For instance, though much research has emphasized the impact of cognitive processing abnormalities, there is growing support for focusing more on understanding the interplay between sensorimotor activity and basic emotion circuitry in disorders as apparently disparate as depression or fibromyalgia (Canbeyli, 2010;Montoya et al, 2005). Robustly activating the aversion-related system before using aversive cues as probes may help to identify subtle network differences across individuals, particularly patients showing altered aversion-related processing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%