2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-2956-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ablation for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Efficacy and Prognostic Factors

Abstract: Comparable survival figures from previously published systematic reviews suggest that hepatic resection is the most effective treatment for recurrent HCC. However, ablation can be a safe and effective option for the majority of patients with recurrent disease who are unsuitable for surgery. Elevated levels of AFP suggest a poorer prognosis following ablation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Improvements in technology for thermal ablation have led to increased ablation reproducibility and the emergence of RFA and MWA as safe and effective alternatives to tumor resection. 5,6,[21][22][23] From a technical and practical standpoint, MWA generates a more predictable ablation field than RFA due to the absence of electrical and thermal "sink" within the near-field ablation zone. However, with both MWA and RFA thermal damage remains indiscriminate, and in addition to killing tumor cells, widespread damage to the underlying hepatic architecture occurs within the ablated area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements in technology for thermal ablation have led to increased ablation reproducibility and the emergence of RFA and MWA as safe and effective alternatives to tumor resection. 5,6,[21][22][23] From a technical and practical standpoint, MWA generates a more predictable ablation field than RFA due to the absence of electrical and thermal "sink" within the near-field ablation zone. However, with both MWA and RFA thermal damage remains indiscriminate, and in addition to killing tumor cells, widespread damage to the underlying hepatic architecture occurs within the ablated area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17] A recent systematic review of 19 retrospective series that focused on ablation for recurrent HCC revealed that 5-year survival rates after RFA for recurrent HCC was 40% (range 23-83%). 9 However, they also concluded that there was insufficient date to analyze survival outcomes after microwave ablation. In addition, there have been no studies comparing RFA and microwave ablation for recurrent HCC to date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] In addition to a large number of studies about local ablation therapy for primary HCC, a recent systematic review focused on local ablation therapy for recurrent HCC have reported that RFA was an effective option for patients with recurrent HCC. 9 However, little evidence is available regarding long-term outcomes after microwave ablation for recurrent HCC after curative hepatectomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though better prognosis obtained in small tumor identified by screening might the result of “lead time bias,” there were still several treatments potential to improve prognosis or palliation. Cauchy et al [3538] concluded 3 studies from Zhong et al [35] , Sasaki et al [37] , and Thomasset et al [36] in World Journal of Surgery and thought oncologic risk of isolated small lesion was underestimated. Only for patients without severe underlying parenchymal lesion, locoregional or resectional therapies and liver transplantation might be able to achieve similar outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%