2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01162.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ability of Wildlife Overpasses to Provide Connectivity and Prevent Genetic Isolation

Abstract: We reviewed research on wildlife overpasses in the context of their genetic effectiveness to provide connectivity between population patches that have been isolated by road construction. The potential ecological consequences of such habitat fragmentation include reduction of gene flow between subpopulations and hence an increase in genetic differentiation and a decrease in genetic diversity. Among the solutions to provide connectivity between patches isolated by roads, wildlife overpasses are one of the most e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
109
0
13

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
109
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar investigation into whether the crossings of the bridge by possums result in reproduction on the other side and restore the gene flow is essential in order to assess the true conservation value of rope bridges (Corlatti et al 2009). We also need to assess whether the rope bridge provides a safe passage for dispersing juveniles, therefore assisting the restoration of gene flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar investigation into whether the crossings of the bridge by possums result in reproduction on the other side and restore the gene flow is essential in order to assess the true conservation value of rope bridges (Corlatti et al 2009). We also need to assess whether the rope bridge provides a safe passage for dispersing juveniles, therefore assisting the restoration of gene flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wildlife crossings are one of the measures used to mitigate barrier effects and reduce wildlife road-kill, improving connectivity between habitats fragmented by roads (Beckmann et al, 2010;Corlatti et al, 2009;Lesbarrères and Fahrig, 2012). These crossings should not lead to ecological "dead-ends", but must link to a larger functional landscape and habitat complex that allows wildlife to disperse, move freely, and meet their daily and life needs now and in the future, including projected land-use changes (Beckmann et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, bridges should be flanked by pole barriers to ensure safe passage well above moving traffic (Zuberogoitia et al 2015). Finally, functional connectivity should be evaluated with molecular methods and BACI designs implemented to know the effectiveness of mitigation measures (Balkenhol and Waits 2009;Corlatti et al 2009;Clevenger and Sawaya 2010;Simmons et al 2010;Soanes et al 2013). …”
Section: Wildlife Passes Combined With Funnelling Fencingmentioning
confidence: 99%