Summary. The quality of sheep milk is paramount in controlling the quality of dairy products made from it. We describe the factors affecting the quality of the milk of sheep milked commercially for dairy production, with an emphasis on Australia and New Zealand. Some of these factors, such as the genotype of the sheep, are difficult to control, but others are environmental factors, such as the nutrition and management of the milking flock, and can be manipulated by the farmer to produce high quality milk. To obtain high quality milk, ewes must be milked out regularly and completely, which implies adopting appropriate milking routines and milking equipment. It is also important that the ewes are healthy and receive adequate diets. Physiologically the ewes must be in an appropriate stage of lactation because at the very beginning and at the end of lactation the milk is of poor manufacturing quality, even though it has high fat and protein content. These factors and their influence on milk quality for the processing of milk into dairy products, especially cheese, are described and critically examined.

A Formagraph was used to test the effects of some of the exogenous factors that can affect the processing properties of milk (pH, soluble calcium, rennet concentration, coagulation temperature), and two of the endogenous factors (protein and fat concentration), on the comparative clotting properties of sheep and cows' milk, namely renneting time (r), rate of ®rming (k20) and curd consistency (A30). A lower pH decreased r and k20 and increased A30 in both sheep and cows' milk. The addition of calcium chloride did not affect the clotting properties of sheep milk, but in cows' milk it decreased r and k20 and increased A30. Increasing the concentration of rennet decreased r and k20 and increased A30 for both sheep and cows' milk. Increasing the coagulation temperature from 30 to 38°C decreased r for both sheep and cows' milk, but it decreased k20 and increased A30 only in cows' milk. Increasing the protein concentration decreased r in both sheep and cows' milk; it did not affect k20 of sheep milk, but it decreased that of cows' milk and increased A30 in both milks. Increasing the fat concentration had little effect on r and k20 in either sheep cows' milk, but it decreased A30 in both milks. In general, sheep milk had faster renneting times and rates of ®rming and greater curd consistency than cows' milk, and its clotting properties tended to be less affected by changes in the clotting conditions.

Sarda ewes, ∼4·5 million animals producing 500 000 tonnes milk annually, are one of the most important breeds of dairy sheep in the Mediterranean area. Several studies (Casu & Labussière, 1972; Labussière et al. 1981; Gallego et al. 1983; Rebello de Andrade et al. 1989; Bencini, 1993) have shown that milk production is influenced by mammary gland size and cistern dimension. The size of the mammary cistern affects both milk secretion rate and milk emission kinetics during milking.Milk secretion rate is controlled at the mammary gland level mainly by a protein feedback inhibitor of lactation (FIL), which is produced by mammary epithelial cells and secreted together with milk into the alveoli (Wilde & Peaker, 1990). As the alveoli are the site of action of the FIL (Henderson & Peaker, 1984), the FIL affects the rate of secretion when the milk is stored in the secretory tissue, whereas it is inactive in the milk stored in the cistern. As a consequence, the action of the FIL should be less in animals with a greater cistern volume, because a large proportion of milk is stored in the mammary cistern and the time during which the milk is in contact with the alveoli is reduced. This hypothesis is supported by the finding that the milk production of cows (Dewhurst & Knight, 1992; Knight & Dewhurst, 1992, 1994) and sheep (Karam et al. 1971; Enne et al. 1972) with large cistern storage capacities was almost unaffected by changes in the frequency of milking.Cistern volume also affects milk emission kinetics and the proportion of stripped milk obtained at milking (Labussière, 1988). Cisternal milk is immediately available for removal, whereas alveolar milk is available only after operation of the ejection reflex, necessary in dairy ewes for complete udder emptying (Bruckmaier et al. 1997). Therefore, in animals readily able to expel alveolar milk into the cistern before the whole cisternal milk fraction is removed (Pazzona et al. 1978; Bruckmaier et al. 1997), a larger cistern volume enables milking time to be reduced by eliminating or restricting the need for stripping.On the basis of the above considerations, the volume of the mammary gland cistern could be proposed as a selection objective to improve milk production and milking ability of dairy ewes. For this purpose, a quick, accurate and economic method for measuring it is needed. The ultrasound technique allows the internal structure of the mammary gland cistern to be observed clearly in sheep (Ruberte et al. 1994; Pulina et al. 1996; Bruckmaier et al. 1997), cows (Bruckmaier et al. 1994b) and goats (Bruckmaier et al. 1994a). Cistern size has been measured by ultrasound in dairy cows (Bruckmaier et al. 1994b) and sheep (Pulina & Nudda, 1996), where a positive correlation between milk yield and cistern area calculated from the ultrasound images of mammary glands was found. However, area estimation requires the use of expensive ultrasound equipment or of a digitizing tablet. In both cases, area measurement is difficult owing to the irregular shape of the cistern.The aim of this study was to test the use of linear measurements taken directly from ultrasound images to estimate cistern size in dairy ewes.

Sarda (n = 8), Awassi (n = 8), and Merino (n = 8) ewes were subjected unilaterally to once-daily milking (ODM) or twice daily milking (TDM) to test the hypothesis that the two breeds highly selected for milk production (Sarda and Awassi) would not respond as much to a change in the frequency of milking as the Merino, a wool sheep that has not been selected for dairy production. Milk composition and somatic cell count (SCC) were also assessed to determine if the changes in milking frequency affected milk quality. Milk yield was 24% and 18% lower in ODM udder halves than TDM udder halves in Sarda and Awassi breeds, respectively. The yield loss due to ODM was similar to that observed in Merino ewes (23%) and did not support our hypothesis. Fat content did not differ significantly in any breeds between ODM and TDM udder halves. Protein content was higher in the milk of ODM than TDM udder halves in Sarda and Merino ewes. The SCC was influenced by milking treatment only in the Sarda ewes, with high values observed in the milk of ODM udder halves. The same trend was observed in the Awassi and Merino breeds, but the differences were not significant. The effects on milk yield, composition, and SCC caused by ODM were completely reversed when TDM was resumed. This suggests that in sheep flocks the milk yield losses due to short-time suppression of one daily milking, for example, on festive days, are low and temporary.

Milk production with dairy ewes requires more intensive systems and more nutrients per animal than are usually necessary for meat or wool production systems. During lactation, nutrient requirements may be very high. Inadequate feeding may reduce both the daily milk production and the length of the lactation. Adequate feeding requires proper balancing of rations. This, in turn, requires estimation of the nutrient requirements and feed intake of the animals and of the nutritive value of the feed. Proper feeding strategies for the lactating ewe cannot be based simply on what is known about dairy cows. Even though much of the information available for dairy cattle is valid for dairy sheep, it is necessary to be aware of the differences between the two species to avoid using inappropriate feeding strategies for the lactating ewe.