1983
DOI: 10.2307/3808630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ability of Different Rumen Inocula to Digest Range Forages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sagebrush and juniper were the main forage species available from late December through early March. Winter estimates of in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) are 40À48% for Utah juniper (Bunderson et al 1986, Welch 1989), 45À65% for big sagebrush (Ward 1971, Kufeld et al 1981, Welch and Pederson 1981, Welch 1989, and 53% for black sagebrush (Welch et al 1983, Welch 1989. Winter estimates of CP range from 6À12% for these same species (Welch 1989, Wambolt 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sagebrush and juniper were the main forage species available from late December through early March. Winter estimates of in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) are 40À48% for Utah juniper (Bunderson et al 1986, Welch 1989), 45À65% for big sagebrush (Ward 1971, Kufeld et al 1981, Welch and Pederson 1981, Welch 1989, and 53% for black sagebrush (Welch et al 1983, Welch 1989. Winter estimates of CP range from 6À12% for these same species (Welch 1989, Wambolt 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our estimates of bitterbrush IVDMD were considerably lower than 50% in all cases. This was expected based on previous winter estimates of bitterbrush IVDMD, which have ranged from 16.3 to 33.2% (Ward 1971, Urness et al 1977, Welch and Pederson 1981, Welch et al 1983a, 1983b, Welch and Wagstaff 1992. Our estimates of bitterbrush CP met the approximate 5-7% minimum CP requirement for deer maintenance (Einarson 1946, Dietz 1965, Murphy and Coates 1966, Holter et al 1979.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The rumen inoculum source for the estimation of digestibility was obtained from Hereford-crossbred cows maintained on an alfalfa/barley diet. Welch et al (1983b) found that different sources of rumen inocula, from both domestic and wild ruminants on different diets, similarly digested a wide variety of forages. Also, forage samples tend to be ranked correctly in terms of relative quality when different inocula sources are used (Robbins et al 1975).…”
Section: Determination Of Ivdmd and Cpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I used rumen inoculum from a cow rather than from a caribou because in several studies of digestibilities of forages utilized by wild herbivores, the use of a domestic ruminant as the inoculum source had given very reliable results (Palmer et al., 1976;Palmer and Cowan, 1980;Welch et al, 1983;Brooks and Urness, 1984;Crawford and Hankinson, 1984). A single domestic inoculum source also reduces the variability of the rumen fluid caused by the use of several donors feeding on different diets (Clary et al, 1988;Pehrson and Faber, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%