2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abilities and strategies of blind and sighted subjects in visuo-spatial imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
67
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
67
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained in previous studies (Vanlierde and Wanet-Defalque, 2004; Cornoldi et al, 2009) seem to suggest that dissimilarities in the strategies employed may indeed mediate the observed performance differences between blind and sighted participants. For example, verbal strategies appear to be more effective than spatial strategies for early- and congenitally blind, whereas the opposite holds for the late-blind and the sighted (Vanlierde and Wanet-Defalque, 2004; Cornoldi et al, 2009). Despite the existence of previous research investigating the behavioral effects of reliance on different cognitive styles, the effect of individual preferences for object imagery, spatial imagery and verbalizing has not been investigated in the blind, to the best of our knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results obtained in previous studies (Vanlierde and Wanet-Defalque, 2004; Cornoldi et al, 2009) seem to suggest that dissimilarities in the strategies employed may indeed mediate the observed performance differences between blind and sighted participants. For example, verbal strategies appear to be more effective than spatial strategies for early- and congenitally blind, whereas the opposite holds for the late-blind and the sighted (Vanlierde and Wanet-Defalque, 2004; Cornoldi et al, 2009). Despite the existence of previous research investigating the behavioral effects of reliance on different cognitive styles, the effect of individual preferences for object imagery, spatial imagery and verbalizing has not been investigated in the blind, to the best of our knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Previous studies comparing spatial imagery abilities in the sighted and the blind have yielded inconsistent results (see Renzi et al, 2013 for a review), some showing little difference (Vanlierde and Wanet-Defalque, 2004; Vecchi et al, 2004; Giudice et al, 2011) but others reporting that the blind are impaired compared to the sighted (Vecchi, 1998; Aleman et al, 2001; Knauff and May, 2006; Cornoldi et al, 2009). For example, Vecchi (1998) found that the congenitally blind were less accurate than the sighted when tested on a task that involved learning target squares and pathways on haptic matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, visual imagery has been found to play a critical role in mediating tactile perception and recognition in normally sighted individuals (see Lacey et al, 2010, Scocchia et al, 2009), as also is suggested by the involvement of the occipital cortex in haptic discrimination (e.g., Merabet et al, 2007, Merabet et al, 2004). Accordingly, different studies suggest that prior visual experience can be used by the late blind to support their haptic and auditory perception, thereby helping them to generate a mental representation of the surrounding environment (e.g., Alary et al, 2008, Postma, Zuidhoek, Noordzij, & Kappers, 2008, Vanlierde & Wanet-Defalque, 2004). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vanlierde et al [24] also found a similar pattern of activation for blind and sighted participants in a spatial imagery task of 2D matrices, involving the precuneus, superior parietal lobule and occipital gyrus, however, participants differed in their strategy. Sighted participants used a visual imagery strategy, while blind participants used an X-Y coordinate strategy [24], [26]. Whereas Stilla et al [23] also observed a similar network for blind and sighted individuals in a tactile microspatial discrimination task, the effective connectivity differed between the blind and sighted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%