2016
DOI: 10.22621/cfn.v130i2.1837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aberrant Colouration in the Atlantic Puffin (<i>Fratercula arctica</i>), the Common Murre (<i>Uria aalge</i>), and the Thick-billed Murre (<i>U. lomvia</i>) from Atlantic Canada

Abstract: . 2016. Aberrant colouration in the Atlantic Puffin (Fratercula arctica), the Common Murre (Uria aalge), and the Thick-billed Murre (U. lomvia) from Atlantic Canada. Canadian Field-Naturalist 130(2): 140-145.The colour of birds' plumage and bare parts is an important feature in choice of mate, camouflage, thermoregulation, species recognition, and flight mechanics. Abnormalities in colouration occur in a variety of species and can have important consequences for an individual's survival and fitness. We present… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has remained difficult to move beyond individual sightings due to the limited ability to amass large sample sizes. However, some studies have compiled the published sightings from particular groups or from particular localities (e.g., Alaja and Mikkola 1997, Konter 2015, Bond and Diamond 2016, Lee and You 2016, Mahabal et al 2016, Mikula et al 2017, Abraham et al 2020) or have performed intensive sampling to try to assess the frequency of atypical plumage in a species or clade (Jehl 1985, Møller et al 2007, Martins-Silva et al 2016). More rarely, studies will ask questions that move beyond sightings or frequencies of atypical individuals in the population (Hudon et al 2017, Besozzi et al 2021, Levinson et al 2021, Camacho et al 2022, Hudon and Pyle 2022, Ocampo et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has remained difficult to move beyond individual sightings due to the limited ability to amass large sample sizes. However, some studies have compiled the published sightings from particular groups or from particular localities (e.g., Alaja and Mikkola 1997, Konter 2015, Bond and Diamond 2016, Lee and You 2016, Mahabal et al 2016, Mikula et al 2017, Abraham et al 2020) or have performed intensive sampling to try to assess the frequency of atypical plumage in a species or clade (Jehl 1985, Møller et al 2007, Martins-Silva et al 2016). More rarely, studies will ask questions that move beyond sightings or frequencies of atypical individuals in the population (Hudon et al 2017, Besozzi et al 2021, Levinson et al 2021, Camacho et al 2022, Hudon and Pyle 2022, Ocampo et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%