Aberrant Behavior Checklist

Aman, Michael G.; Singh, Nirbhay N.; Stewart, Alistair; Field, Carolyn

doi:10.1037/t10453-000

Cited by 286 publications

(245 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

231

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Their study used the Child Behavior Checklist [Achenbach, 1991] and The Compulsive Behavior Checklist [Gedye, 1992]. Graham et al illustrate some of the differences between behavior in some boys with CHARGE and that in boys with other genetic conditions using the Profile of Fundamental Goals and Motivation Sensitivities [Reiss and Havercamp, 1998], the Child Behavior Checklist [Achenbach, 1991], and the Aberrant Behavior Checklist [Aman and Singh, 1986]. Hartshorne, Grialou, and Parker's [2005] research using the Autism Behavior Checklist [Krug et al, 1993] shows a particular pattern of subscale scores for CHARGE that differs from those with autism and from those who are deafblind due to other causes.…”

Section: Current Studies On Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

Behavior in CHARGE syndrome: Introduction to the special topic

Hartshorne

Hefner

Davenport

2005

American J of Med Genetics Pt A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Challenging behavior in children with CHARGE syndrome has been increasingly a concern of parents, educators, and health professionals. This article introduces the special topic in the American Journal of Medical Genetics on behavior in individuals with CHARGE syndrome. It provides background on CHARGE syndrome, diagnostic criteria, and the relationship of sensory and other physical deficits with both development and behavior. Four themes related to our developing understanding of behavior in CHARGE are described: children with CHARGE have behaviors different from those seen in other syndromes with or without deafblindness. The behavior they display is often very adaptive to their environment and to their own disabilities. These behaviors may be partially related to problems with arousal and self‐regulation. And, finally, all papers point to behavior as communication, especially within relationships, where it is essential for maximizing intellectual and social outcomes. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

show abstract

Section: Current Studies On Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

Behavior in CHARGE syndrome: Introduction to the special topic

Hartshorne

Hefner

Davenport

2005

American J of Med Genetics Pt A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, in 1999, Summers and Feldman conducted a study comparing scores on the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (Aman & Singh, 1986) of 27 individuals with Angelman syndrome, 24 individuals from an outpatient behaviour management service for children and young adults with developmental disabilities (clinical group), and 23 individuals who were participants in a previous survey of the prevalence of behaviour problems amongst people with developmental disabilities in an Ontario wide survey (community group). They found that the participants with Angelman syndrome scored significantly lower than both comparison groups on the irritability and lethargy scales.…”

Section: ++++++++++++ Insertmentioning

confidence: 99%

The behavioural phenotype of Angelman syndrome

Horsler

Oliver

2005

J intellect Disabil Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Parent respondents rate their child's behavior directly on the NCBRF rating scale using a problem rating scale of: 0=not a problem/does not occur to 3=major problem/occurs frequently. Construct validity was reported by the authors as well as concurrent validity evidence comparing the NCBRF scores with the Aberrant Behavior Checklist [27], a well-established problem behavior scale used with this population. The authors concluded that the NCBRF's validity evidence was strong, and that the subscales of the ABC and the NCBRF that were thought to be related tap similar constructs.…”

Section: Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Formmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shakespeare and Autism: A Pilot Study Examining the Treatment Effects and Predictors of Treatment Response of the Hunter Heartbeat Method

Mehling¹,

Tassé²,

Andridge³

2017

Autism Open Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This pilot study was designed to explore the potential impact of participation in the Hunter Heartbeat Method, a drama-based social skills intervention, on the core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A sample of 10 children with ASD participated in this study. Children were assessed at three time-points: before the start of the intervention (T1), after 14 weeks of participation (T2) and after 42 weeks of participation (T3). Findings from this pilot study indicated that the Hunter Heartbeat Method (HHM) is an intervention that shows promise in impacting social, communication and facial emotion recognition deficits associated with ASD. We also identified the individual characteristics of the participants who were responders and non-responders to the HHM intervention. The results of these findings are discussed.

show abstract

Aberrant Behavior Checklist

Cited by 286 publications

References 0 publications

Behavior in CHARGE syndrome: Introduction to the special topic

Behavior in CHARGE syndrome: Introduction to the special topic

The behavioural phenotype of Angelman syndrome

Shakespeare and Autism: A Pilot Study Examining the Treatment Effects and Predictors of Treatment Response of the Hunter Heartbeat Method

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About