2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2013.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abdominal muscle EMG-activity during bridge exercises on stable and unstable surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

9
69
4
17

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
9
69
4
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, EMG magnitudes may vary depending on whether the exercises were performed dynamically 39 or isometrically. 6,8,17 Compared with the prone bridge on toes, the side bridge on toes generates significantly greater external oblique (69% vs 47% MVIC) and lumbar paraspinal (42% vs 5% MVIC) activity, but no significant difference in upper rectus abdominis activity, 7 which is similar to the current results. (21) 44 (11) 56 (32) 40 (26) 7 (3) h,i,j 17 (13)…”
Section: Muscle Activity Between Prone and Supine Position Exercisessupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, EMG magnitudes may vary depending on whether the exercises were performed dynamically 39 or isometrically. 6,8,17 Compared with the prone bridge on toes, the side bridge on toes generates significantly greater external oblique (69% vs 47% MVIC) and lumbar paraspinal (42% vs 5% MVIC) activity, but no significant difference in upper rectus abdominis activity, 7 which is similar to the current results. (21) 44 (11) 56 (32) 40 (26) 7 (3) h,i,j 17 (13)…”
Section: Muscle Activity Between Prone and Supine Position Exercisessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…2,17,23,25 Muscle Activity Between Prone and Side Position Exercises Our hypothesis that rectus abdominus activity would be greater in prone than side position exercises and oblique and lumbar paraspinal activity would be greater in side than prone position exercises was largely supported by the results of the current study as well as other studies. [6][7][8]17,24,36,38,39 However, 1 study 17 reported greater upper rectus abdominis (46% vs 26% MVIC) and internal oblique (57% vs 28% MVIC) activity but less external oblique (51% vs 62% MVIC) activity than the current study. EMG magnitudes may vary among EMG studies due to different EMG normalization methods, which is a limitation when comparing EMG studies.…”
Section: Muscle Activity Between Prone and Supine Position Exercisescontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bridge exercise is effective for deep abdominal muscle strengthening and improvement of motor control [19]. It is difficult to increase the contraction of the deep abdominal muscles with verbal instruction alone; hence, it is important to describe an effective method for prompting an automatic contraction of these muscles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study assessed abdominal muscle activity during a prone, side, and supine bridge, on stable and unstable surfaces [19]. Guthrie et al [21] investigated the ability of two types of bridging-exercise progressions to facilitate the lateral abdominal muscles during an ADIM in individuals with LBP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%