Abbott curves characteristics of turned surfaces

Petropoulos, G.; Torrance, A.A.; Pandazaras, C.

doi:10.1016/s0890-6955(02)00240-7

Cited by 16 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fig. 1 presents results of previous studies [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] on ferrous and non-ferrous work materials, for single crystal diamond (SCD), ceramic (PCD and PCBN) and cemented carbide tools. Given reasons for roughnesses larger than kinematic include machine tool limits (dynamic stiffness, feed control and bearing clearance effects), work material (it is responsible for process forces and how the chip separates from the work) and the insert edge quality (roughness along the edge and radius in the plane normal to the edge).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Given reasons for roughnesses larger than kinematic include machine tool limits (dynamic stiffness, feed control and bearing clearance effects), work material (it is responsible for process forces and how the chip separates from the work) and the insert edge quality (roughness along the edge and radius in the plane normal to the edge). However, only three of [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] record cutting edge radius values and none investigates roughness along the edge. Further, some record R a , some R z and some present surface profile charts.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Surface finishes from turning and facing with round nosed tools

et al. 2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Surface finishes from turning and facing with round nosed tools

et al. 2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In secondary edge studies, researchers [1,4,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], machining ferrous and non-ferrous work materials with carbide, ceramic (PCD and PCBN) and single crystal diamond (SCD) tool inserts, report peak-to-valley roughnesses, e.g. R z , close to kinematic values f 2 / (8r n ) at large feeds, where f is feed, r n is tool nose radius.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The influence of cutting edge sharpness on surface finish in facing with round nosed cutting tools

Childs

Dornfeld

Lee

et al. 2008

CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The following parameters, parameter ratios and functions are proposed and/or established to be sensitive in profile shape [12][13][14][15][16]. They are briefly discussed in view of their distinctive power and tribological significance.…”

Section: Presentation Of the Profile Measures Usedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-parameter identification and control of turned surface textures

Petropoulos

Pandazaras

Vaxevanidis

et al. 2005

Int J Adv Manuf Technol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A method for characterizing turned surface textures corresponding to varying cutting variables leading to differing profile shape is presented with emphasis on a global view of turning machinability parameters. Through a multi-parameter experimental analysis of turned steel specimens, several standardized parameters are developed. The ability of these parameters are tested to distinguish between different profiles in shape or to identify some particular features with respect to cutting factors. It is indicated that texture statistical functions and parameters are the most effective for relative discrimination and control. Based on the results of this study, new maps for turned surface control are developed. With regards to the variability of some of the parameters at different surface measuring sites, it is evident that the amount of scatter is lower when cutting factors offer regular chip formation. Nomenclaturea, b parameters of the beta distribution f feed [mm/rev] m number of peaks in the profile n(0) number of intersections of the profile with the mean line q 1 , q 2 parameters of the Fisher-Pearson distribution system r mean asperity curvature [µm] R a profile average height [µm] R DelA mean inclination of the asperities [ • ] R ku kurtosis of the profile height distribution R lr ratio of the real length to the horizontal length of the profile [%] R p the distance between the maximum height and the mean line of the profile [µm] R q standard deviation of the profile height distribution [µm] R sk skewness of the profile height distribution R sm mean spacing of the asperities at the centre line [µm] R t maximum profile height [µm] v cutting speed [m/min] β auto correlation length [µm] λ a mean wavelength of the profile irregularities [µm] µ mean value of the log-normal distribution σ standard deviation of the log-normal distribution µ mean estimator of a distribution s standard deviation estimator of a distribution

show abstract

Abbott curves characteristics of turned surfaces

Cited by 16 publications

References 3 publications

Surface finishes from turning and facing with round nosed tools

Surface finishes from turning and facing with round nosed tools

The influence of cutting edge sharpness on surface finish in facing with round nosed cutting tools

Multi-parameter identification and control of turned surface textures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About