2009
DOI: 10.4310/mrl.2009.v16.n1.a14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

$A_1$ bounds for Calderón-Zygmund operators related to a problem of Muckenhoupt and Wheeden

Abstract: Abstract. We obtain an L p (w) bound for Calderón-Zygmund operators T when w ∈ A 1 . This bound is sharp both with respect to w A 1 and with respect to p. As a result, we get a new L 1,∞ (w) estimate for T related to a problem of Muckenhoupt and Wheeden.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer the reader to the work of Buckley [3], Petermichl and Volberg [27], Petermichl [25,26], Lacey, Moen, Pérez, and Torres [16], Lerner [19,20], Lerner, Ombrosi, and Pérez [21,22], Lacey, Petermichl, and Reguera [15] and Hytonen, Lacey, Reguera, and Vagharshakyan [14], etc.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer the reader to the work of Buckley [3], Petermichl and Volberg [27], Petermichl [25,26], Lacey, Moen, Pérez, and Torres [16], Lerner [19,20], Lerner, Ombrosi, and Pérez [21,22], Lacey, Petermichl, and Reguera [15] and Hytonen, Lacey, Reguera, and Vagharshakyan [14], etc.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Nazarov, Reznikov, Vasyunin, and Volberg [265] disproved the weaker inequality T L 1 (w)→L 1,∞ (w) ≤ C [w] A 1 log(e + [w] A 1 ) α for α < 1 5 . Lerner, Ombrosi, and Pérez [223] had previously shown that the preceding inequality holds with α = 1 for any Calderón-Zygmund operator T .…”
Section: Historical Notesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Applying Corollary 4.2 we obtain (4.4). For Calderón-Zygmund operators, the estimate (4.3) was proved in [22] with N(t) = t. Then (4.4) holds linearly in [w] A q . 2…”
Section: In Particular (44) Holds With N(t) = T If T Is a Calderón-mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We consider this question in Section 4 in two ways, depending on whether the basic estimate is for p 0 > p or for p 0 < p. In particular, for Calderón-Zygmund operators, we extend to A q weights an estimate for A 1 weights due to Lerner, Ombrosi and Pérez [22].…”
Section: A Weight Is a Nonnegative Locally Integrable Function A Weimentioning
confidence: 99%