1997
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199709001-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A3 Sevoflurane Vital Capacity Induction Compared With Propofol Intravenous Induction for Adult Ambulatory Anesthesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…pital and clinic setting has grown significantly over the last 10 years and is projected to continue to grow rapidly (239).…”
Section: Cost-containment Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…pital and clinic setting has grown significantly over the last 10 years and is projected to continue to grow rapidly (239).…”
Section: Cost-containment Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like sevoflurane, its popularity results from its ability to facilitate a rapid, smooth induction and fast recovery, with a low incidence of postoperative adverse effects (54,59,135,241). In many studies, the time course to induction with sevoflurane has been comparable to that of propofol (104,239). Some studies have indicated that induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane took 30 to 60 sec longer than with propofol, depending on the end point measured and the concentration of sevoflurane used (202,307).…”
Section: Mask Induction Maintenance and Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Philip et al . [5], however, showed that sevoflurane–nitrous oxide induction was faster than propofol induction. To date, these comparisons have been made using clinical end‐points that may not be definite.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%