2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00202-021-01340-3
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A ZVS high step-up converter based on an integrated boost-cuk topology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this figure, considering higher values for n 21 to a small amount value towards unity (n 21 →1) (increasing this value does not have much effect on increasing their parasitic resistance) can cause proper efficiency in the proposed converter. From Table 2, only the proposed and converters in [17], and [26][27][28][29] act under soft-switching condition along with a very low reverse recovery problem. At turns ratio n 21 = 0.75, n 31 = 1.05 (for TWCI), n = 1.8 (for two-winding CI), Figure 9 shows the total voltage gain comparison of the converters specified in Table 2.…”
Section: Efficiency Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to this figure, considering higher values for n 21 to a small amount value towards unity (n 21 →1) (increasing this value does not have much effect on increasing their parasitic resistance) can cause proper efficiency in the proposed converter. From Table 2, only the proposed and converters in [17], and [26][27][28][29] act under soft-switching condition along with a very low reverse recovery problem. At turns ratio n 21 = 0.75, n 31 = 1.05 (for TWCI), n = 1.8 (for two-winding CI), Figure 9 shows the total voltage gain comparison of the converters specified in Table 2.…”
Section: Efficiency Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Table 2, only the proposed and converters in [17], and [26–29] act under soft‐switching condition along with a very low reverse recovery problem. At turns ratio n 21 = 0.75, n 31 = 1.05 (for TWCI), n = 1.8 (for two‐winding CI), Figure 9 shows the total voltage gain comparison of the converters specified in Table 2.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this aim, in addition to the power switch, an auxiliary switch is needed. 25 Despite the mentioned merits, coupled inductor has several disadvantages such as higher current ripple and higher magnetizing inductor current. 26 A two-winding DC-DC converter is proposed in Hwu et al 26 and it's compared with a similar two-winding structure versus the inductor size and the core dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, utilization of soft switching‐based structures can raise the converter efficiency. For this aim, in addition to the power switch, an auxiliary switch is needed 25 . Despite the mentioned merits, coupled inductor has several disadvantages such as higher current ripple and higher magnetizing inductor current 26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%