2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A worldwide comparison of the management of T1 and T2 anterior floor of the mouth and tongue squamous cell carcinoma – Extent of surgical resection and reconstructive measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be difficult to reliably obtain clear margins in cT2 tumors of the floor of mouth (FOM), gingiva, buccal mucosa, retromolar region, and palate without requiring free flap reconstruction of the defect, but this is at the discretion and experience of the surgeon. Conversely, the oral tongue can tolerate aggressive resection without significant detriment to function when repaired locally, meaning larger tumors can be suitable for SNB.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be difficult to reliably obtain clear margins in cT2 tumors of the floor of mouth (FOM), gingiva, buccal mucosa, retromolar region, and palate without requiring free flap reconstruction of the defect, but this is at the discretion and experience of the surgeon. Conversely, the oral tongue can tolerate aggressive resection without significant detriment to function when repaired locally, meaning larger tumors can be suitable for SNB.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsurgical reconstruction is preferred for large tongue defects providing adequate bulk to improve swallowing function, preventing cicatricial restriction of tongue mobility and preserving the “finger function” of the tongue (Chepeha, ). The radial forearm (RF) and the anterolateral (ALT) free flaps are among the most popular reconstructive options worldwide (Kansy et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further reason may be that we removed a full section of bone along with the periosteum, a critical source of bone‐forming osteoblasts and MSCs (Lin, Fateh, Salem, & Intini, 2014). This resembles how the resection procedure has to be carried out in many clinical cases such as when infected or tumor‐hosting bone is removed with safety margins (Kansy et al, 2017). The removal of the periosteum creates a difficult environment for bone formation because all bone‐forming cells would have to migrate to the defect from adjacent bone and bone marrow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%