2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2016.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A working model for the assessment of disruptions in social behavior among aged rats: The role of sex differences, social recognition, and sensorimotor processes

Abstract: Aging results in a natural decline in social behavior, yet little is known about the processes underlying these changes. Engaging in positive social interaction is associated with many health benefits, including reduced stress reactivity, and may serve as a potential buffer against adverse consequences of aging. The goal of these studies was to establish a tractable model for the assessment of social behavior deficits associated with late aging. Thus, in Exp. 1, 1.5-, 3-, and 18-month-old male Fischer 344 (F34… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, adult male Lister rats spend more time interacting with a familiar age-matched conspecific (Johnston and File, 1991) and adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (Stack et al, 2010; Varlinskaya et al, 2014) and Wistar rats (Dumais et al, 2013) engage in higher levels of active social interaction with a novel adult or juvenile conspecific (Dumais et al, 2013), relative to their female counterparts. We have shown previously that 3-month old male and female Fisher 344 (F344) rats exhibit similar levels of social investigation of novel and familiar social partners, with both sexes demonstrating a significant decline in social behavior during late aging (i.e., 18 months and beyond) (Perkins et al, 2016). Although F344 rats exhibit lower levels of social behavior relative to other strains (e.g.…”
Section: 0 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, adult male Lister rats spend more time interacting with a familiar age-matched conspecific (Johnston and File, 1991) and adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (Stack et al, 2010; Varlinskaya et al, 2014) and Wistar rats (Dumais et al, 2013) engage in higher levels of active social interaction with a novel adult or juvenile conspecific (Dumais et al, 2013), relative to their female counterparts. We have shown previously that 3-month old male and female Fisher 344 (F344) rats exhibit similar levels of social investigation of novel and familiar social partners, with both sexes demonstrating a significant decline in social behavior during late aging (i.e., 18 months and beyond) (Perkins et al, 2016). Although F344 rats exhibit lower levels of social behavior relative to other strains (e.g.…”
Section: 0 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, much less is known about the neurobiology of adult responding to a same sex conspecific. Compared to adolescents, adults exhibit reduced levels of social behavior (Perkins et al, 2016). Adolescents also exhibit greater induction of c-Fos protein in response to a social partner in the amygdala (AMG) and BNST, whereas adults exhibit less c-Fos induction following a social interaction in the PFC, nucleus accumbens (NAC), and brainstem relative to their counterparts placed alone in the context (Varlinskaya et al, 2013).…”
Section: 0 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In young rodents, social behavior typically consists of social play and active investigation of a conspecific through sniffing and social contact behavior [811]. Using these rodent models, social processes have been shown to be easily disrupted by a wide variety of circumstances, including stress challenges [12, 13], natural aging [14] and acute illness [5, 6, 15, 16]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…housing conditions) of the experimental test subject also determines the level of social behavior expressed in subsequent, discrete tests of social interaction [27, 28]. For example, both short-term (not more than 24 h) and long-term (several days to several weeks) social deprivation have often been used to increase the frequency of social behavior exhibited during social testing [14, 28]. On the other hand, prolonged social deprivation can have seriously detrimental effects, particularly when the social deprivation is incurred during critical developmental epochs [2931].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that complex behaviors, both social (social memory and social recognition, sexual and family behavior, social advantage, interspecific interaction), and non-social (learning, remembering) in animals also undergo a wide range of changes in aging [8]. Decreased sensory and motor functions and impaired coordination [9], increased anxiety [10], cognitive dysfunction associated with a gradual decrease in structural and functional plasticity in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex [11] -these are just the main factors that influence the behavior of animals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%