2014 Seventh International Conference on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Networking (ICMU) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icmu.2014.6799055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A wireless full-duplex and multi-hop network with collision avoidance using directional antennas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the uniqueness of FD communication, various MAC protocols for wireless FD networks have been proposed. Such protocols are classified into two main types, i.e., header snooping-based FD MAC [4][5][6][7][8] and RTS/CTS-based FD MAC [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The difference between the two schemes is whether or not the network nodes exchange control frames for DATA-frame transmission with FD.…”
Section: Wireless Fd Communication and Csma-based Fd Mac Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the uniqueness of FD communication, various MAC protocols for wireless FD networks have been proposed. Such protocols are classified into two main types, i.e., header snooping-based FD MAC [4][5][6][7][8] and RTS/CTS-based FD MAC [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The difference between the two schemes is whether or not the network nodes exchange control frames for DATA-frame transmission with FD.…”
Section: Wireless Fd Communication and Csma-based Fd Mac Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAC protocols for distributed networks, e.g., multi-hop networks and wireless local area network (WLAN), have been designed based on carrier-sense multiple access with collision avoidance (CSMA/CA). Two main types of CSMA-based FD MAC have been proposed; header snooping-based FD MAC [4][5][6][7][8] and request to send/clear to send (RTS/CTS)-based FD MAC [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The difference between the two schemes is whether or not network nodes exchange control frames prior to a DATA-frame transmission with FD communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, this will increase the system hardware component, system complexity, deployment cost, power consumption and introduce synchronization challenges. In recent times, due to advancement in digital electronics technology, the use of a single antenna in a full-duplexing (FD) mode is possible where a single antenna can transmit and receive data simultaneously using the same time and frequency [8]. Use of a single antenna at the LR in FD mode will reduce the number of nodes and eventually lower the cost and power consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main problems in full-duplex communications like the secondary collision problem, that occurs while combining wireless full-duplex with multi-hop communication, is avoided by using directional asynchronous full-duplex medium access control (DAFD-MAC) protocol and directional antennas [62]. Authors in [62] also focused on asynchronous timing adjustment because clock synchronization for all nodes in a multi-hop network is an unsettling task.…”
Section: Previous Work On Multi-hop Network With Full-duplex Relayingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors in [62] also focused on asynchronous timing adjustment because clock synchronization for all nodes in a multi-hop network is an unsettling task. Another problem in full-duplex communications is characterization of the interference relationship between links in the multi-hop full-duplex network.…”
Section: Previous Work On Multi-hop Network With Full-duplex Relayingmentioning
confidence: 99%