2015
DOI: 10.7358/rela-2015-002-pear
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Welfare State for Elephants? A Case Study of Compassionate Stewardship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This seems to happen, for instance, in the case of elephants (Cumming et al, 1997;Guldemond and Van Aarde, 2008;Guldemond et al, 2017). Protecting elephants thus appears to be a good way not only to aid them (Pearce, 2015), but also to prevent other animals who would otherwise come into existence from having terrible lives. If this is so, then conservationist efforts to prevent these animals from disappearing can also be supported by those concerned with wild animal suffering.…”
Section: Can There Be Practical Cases Of Convergence Between Environmentalist and Sentience-focused Approaches?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seems to happen, for instance, in the case of elephants (Cumming et al, 1997;Guldemond and Van Aarde, 2008;Guldemond et al, 2017). Protecting elephants thus appears to be a good way not only to aid them (Pearce, 2015), but also to prevent other animals who would otherwise come into existence from having terrible lives. If this is so, then conservationist efforts to prevent these animals from disappearing can also be supported by those concerned with wild animal suffering.…”
Section: Can There Be Practical Cases Of Convergence Between Environmentalist and Sentience-focused Approaches?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Nussbaum's application of the capabilities approach to animals, see Nussbaum (2007). 20 See, for example, the discussion of elephant welfare in Pearce (2015) or the discussion of chimpanzee welfare in Fritz and Howell (1993).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…elephant (L. Africana), 152 but individual elephants still suffer from and remain vulnerable to diseases, parasitism, accidents, drought, starvation, drowning, predation, and stress. 153 Article XX(g) GATT fails to take into account and remains indifferent to the question of how animals are treated or how they cope with their environment. Another concern is that most animals subject to trade are not covered by the exception, because they are not endangered or threatened by extinction.…”
Section: Article Xx(g) Gattmentioning
confidence: 99%