2011 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2011
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2011.6049733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A weighted calibration method of interferometric SAR data

Abstract: The accuracy of the digital elevation model (DEM) generated by the interferometric synthetic aperture radar (SAR) partly depends on the accuracy of system parameters, so it is necessary to calibrate the system parameters. The traditional calibration method models the elevation error as a linear function of parameter biases, and solves the biases through the sensitivity equations. This paper presents a weighted calibration method applicable to interferometric SAR data. It introduces the weightings to the sensit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation ( 11) is equal to (8), but it is more convenient for solving parameter biases. In (11), a layout of scene pairs which have common TPs as shown in Fig. 2 is instanced to describe the error equations about TPs.…”
Section: Fig 1 Joint Calibration Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Equation ( 11) is equal to (8), but it is more convenient for solving parameter biases. In (11), a layout of scene pairs which have common TPs as shown in Fig. 2 is instanced to describe the error equations about TPs.…”
Section: Fig 1 Joint Calibration Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It depends on the method used to solve the least square system, and possibly on some random variables such as initial conditions for certain algorithms [17]. However, we may find a unique solution to (12) by using Moor-Penrose inverse matrix [2,6,11].…”
Section: Fig 1 Joint Calibration Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations