2022 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/ehb55594.2022.9991526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Wearable Device based on IMU and EMG Sensors for Remote Monitoring of Elbow Rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the studies (n = 26, 84% of clinical population studies) exploited IMU sensors in their wearable platform (usually containing a 3-axis accelerometer, 3-axis gyroscope, and 3-axis magnetometer) to obtain joint angles, accelerations, angular velocities, and posture. While only five studies have included EMG sensors in their wearable platform to obtain muscle activity [30,[38][39][40][41]. Some of the studies have also used other instruments and sensors to obtain measurements or treat an MSK condition, such as using high-power LEDs [42] and thermal flexible printed circuit boards for treatment [32] or using piezoresistive or strain sensors for measurements [35][36][37]43].…”
Section: Clinical Population Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the studies (n = 26, 84% of clinical population studies) exploited IMU sensors in their wearable platform (usually containing a 3-axis accelerometer, 3-axis gyroscope, and 3-axis magnetometer) to obtain joint angles, accelerations, angular velocities, and posture. While only five studies have included EMG sensors in their wearable platform to obtain muscle activity [30,[38][39][40][41]. Some of the studies have also used other instruments and sensors to obtain measurements or treat an MSK condition, such as using high-power LEDs [42] and thermal flexible printed circuit boards for treatment [32] or using piezoresistive or strain sensors for measurements [35][36][37]43].…”
Section: Clinical Population Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the critical aspects is finding the rate of studies aimed to use wearable sensor platforms for either rehabilitation or treatment applications or increasing the quality of remote treatment sessions. In this regard, 11 studies in the clinical population studies category (35% of studies in the category) [26,27,29,32,33,36,37,40,[42][43][44], three studies in the workers' population studies category (10% of studies in the category) [62,80,85], and two studies in the general wearable studies category (11% of studies in the category) have focused on treatment applications [87,98].…”
Section: General Wearable Design/performance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%