“…Let now d = 1, E = R, and x 0 = 0. Moreover, for some fixed T > 0 set a(t, x ) = 1, b(t, x ) = 0, µ(t, x ) = (x (t)) 2 To understand, why the assumption of Corollary 3.4 is not satisfied if we replace Ω by Ω fix the path x ∈ Ω \ Ω with x(t) = tan(tπ/(2T ))1 t<T + ∆1 t≥T for all t ≥ 0. Then, we have T 0 (µ(t, x)) 2 dt = ∞.…”